Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting for April 25, 2016 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-003 - Arden Square Master & Final PUD - 1160 County Road E\Memos_Reports_16-003 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />Sign Code, flexibility has been requested by the applicant and/or conditions have been <br />placed on an approval that would mitigate the nonconformity. <br />12. The proposed Master and Final PUD is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the <br />immediate area or the community as a whole. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Planning Commission was supportive of the request to reduce landscape coverage on the <br />property to 14.6 percent. The Commissioners discussed the challenges associated with <br />redeveloping commercial properties in order to provide sufficient parking and meet RCWD <br />requirements for stormwater management. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that <br />the proposed subsurface basin and treatment system would be an improvement to the existing <br />conditions on the site and beneficial to the City. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission was concerned that the location of the monument sign on the opposite <br />side of the property from where the driveway is located could result in confusion for drivers. <br />Several of the Commissioners did not support the request for a larger sign. The applicant noted <br />that the main purpose of the sign was to provide advertising for the building tenants and not to <br />indicate the entrance to the site. <br /> <br />As a condition of their recommendation for approval, the Planning Commission directed staff to <br />evaluate the location and size of the monument sign with the applicant prior to City Council <br />review. The applicant has provided an addendum to the project narrative describing this <br />evaluation process and an alternative location for the sign along the eastern edge of the entrance <br />drive (Attachment F). To address their concerns about the visibility of the sign from Lexington <br />Avenue, the applicant believes that the sign height and size in the original proposal is necessary. <br />Staff is requesting that the City Council review the proposal and make a final determination <br />regarding the location and size of the monument sign in their motion language. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends approval (6-1, Zimmerman) of Planning Case 16-003 <br />for a Master and Final PUD at 1160 County Road E West, based on the findings of fact and the <br />submitted plans in the April 25, 2016, Report to the City Council, as amended by the following <br />nine (9) conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and the City <br />Council. <br />2. The Developer shall obtain the required development permits within one year of the <br />approval date or the approval shall expire, unless extended by the City Council prior to <br />the approval’s expiration date. Extension requests must be submitted in writing to the <br />City at least 45 days prior to the expiration date.