My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-31-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
05-31-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2016 3:26:30 PM
Creation date
5/27/2016 3:21:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – APRIL 18, 2016 10 <br /> <br />H. Start by Believing Initiative Details and Dates 1:38:30 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated that this is an initiative by Ramsey County and they have asked that cities <br />pass a resolution. He said that common practice for Arden Hills has been to not act on many <br />resolutions that are requested as by approving some and not others, it could be construed that the <br />City Council is passing judgement. He indicated that typically the Council has supported <br />additional resolutions that support its employees (such as Public Works Week, for example). <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes challenged the Council’s stance on the position that the Council does <br />not pass resolutions. She said she does not personally agree with that position and that she <br />supports this particular resolution. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated he is not a huge proponent of resolutions in general. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the Council can receive many requests for resolutions each month <br />but that the Council does not necessarily see them as City staff does not bring them forward <br />because they know the Council does not pass many resolutions as a general rule. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said she would rather the Council have a discussion about all suggested <br />resolutions before making a determination, otherwise it is a preconceived notion if resolutions are <br />not even placed on the agenda. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung said that broad discussions have taken place in the past when former <br />City Administrators raised these questions. He said it was decided that the Council did not want <br />resolutions being presented constantly. He also said people tend to know that Arden Hills does <br />not pass resolutions and therefore have stopped forwarding them to the Council. He agreed that <br />City staff generally would not bring forward a resolution as they know the Council’s position <br />regarding the matter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said she would like to know how many resolution requests have been <br />received. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated again that the Council would then be put in the position where it must pass <br />judgement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she sees a difference in the types of resolutions requests that are <br />received. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed with Councilmember Holmes that the two resolutions on the <br />current agenda are different than other resolutions received as they are from the County and Met <br />Council. He said he has no problem with the content but that he just does not like resolutions in <br />general. He said that Arden Hills has chosen to pass resolutions that directly impact the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant pointed out that City staff will be in communication with the League of Minnesota <br />Cities many times regarding resolutions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.