My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
04-25-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2024 12:15:13 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 11:15:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 25, 2016 8 <br /> 3. A PUD Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council <br /> approval. The Agreement shall be executed prior to the issuance of any development <br /> permits. <br /> 4. The Developer shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the <br /> estimated costs of landscaping prior to the issuance of any development permits. The <br /> financial surety shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured <br /> Minnesota bank. The purpose of the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is <br /> completed in the event that the developer defaults on the Development Agreement. The <br /> City will hold the letter of credit for two years after the installation of landscaping. The <br /> letter of credit should not expire during the two-year period. <br /> 5. The Developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Rice Creek Watershed District <br /> permit for the project prior to the issuance of any development permits. <br /> 6. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the City <br /> Engineer, Building Official, City Planner, and Fire Marshall prior to the issuance of a <br /> Grading and Erosion Control Permit or other development permits. <br /> 7. The Developer shall maintain a minimum drive aisle width of twenty (20) feet along the <br /> west side of the building between the drive-up lane and parking stalls at all times. <br /> 8. No certificate of occupancy will be issued or remain in effect for tenant or business space <br /> using the existing drive-up window on the west side of the building for a fast food <br /> restaurant use. In the event that the Developer or subsequent owner sells or leases building <br /> space or otherwise proposes to use the drive-up window on the west side of the building <br /> for a fast food restaurant use, the Developer or subsequent owner shall submit a PUD <br /> Amendment application proposing modifications to the Site Plan that provides the <br /> minimum vehicle stacking spaces required as specified by the City Code, conform to the <br /> additional minimum requirements included in Section 1325.04 of the City Code, and <br /> satisfies any conditions of approval imposed by the Council. <br /> 9. A Sign Permit shall be required for the monument sign on County Road E. <br /> Councilmember McClung understood that the Fire Marshal recommended a 20-foot width be <br /> maintained for the drive aisle. He indicated that this had been made a Finding of Fact but asked if <br /> this should also be written into the conditions for approval. <br /> Senior Planner Bachler stated that this recommendation was made by the Lake Johanna Fire <br /> Department and explained that as the site was currently designed, a 20-foot drive aisle was being <br /> provided. He noted that the matter would be addressed by Condition 7. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned how many parking spaces were required for the building. <br /> Senior Planner Bachler indicated that the Zoning Code requires 35 parking spaces for the <br /> existing Red Cross use, and that up to 30 spaces may be required for the remaining space if used <br /> for retail. He reported that the site plan shows 67 parking spaces, which meets the City's <br /> minimum parking requirements. <br /> Councilmember Holden inquired if the extra two parking stalls should be eliminated and that the <br /> applicant be required to put more landscaping on the site. She stated that she was not thrilled with <br /> the fact the site would have only 14.6% landscaping coverage, noting that this did not align with <br /> the vision for the B2 Zoning District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.