Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2016 5 <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund recommended the Council take a step back and put themselves into <br />the shoes of the homeowner. He discussed the complications of applying for a variance. He <br />believed the three-foot six-inch encroachment was reasonable. He fully supported the request of <br />the homeowners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes had concern with how the trail would be impacted. She discussed <br />another variance request in the Venus neighborhood where a three car garage had been denied. <br />She understood the opinions of the homeowner had to be weighed along with the needs of <br />residents. For this reason, she stated she would not be able to support the variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Jittila commented he was told that Arden Hills was really big in trying to build community. <br />He asked if this was true. He believed that if the Council were to oppose his variance, that this <br />would be a step back from community building. He stated he was trying to build a useable porch <br />and deck that would allow him to further engage with his residents and walkers on the trail, many <br />of which were his neighbors. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if a wraparound deck would be allowed by the City. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Mrs. Jittila reiterated that no trees would be lost through the proposed deck and three season <br />porch addition. She noted the walking trails were important to her family and she believed she <br />was being penalized because the trails ran adjacent to her property. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed with Councilmember Wicklund’s assessment and stated he <br />had taken into consideration the homeowners viewpoint. However, he believed Pulte made a <br />mistake in placing the home where it was and this was now causing difficulty. His main concern <br />was the fact that the trail would be encroached upon and several of the adjacent property owners <br />have raised this same concern. He stated this was not an easy decision for him but at this time, he <br />could not support the requested variance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund understood the Council was concerned with the trail encroachment <br />and/or screening of the property from the trail. He suggested additional screening be added to the <br />property to maintain some of the characteristics of the trail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated this was not worrisome for her. She commented that she was <br />approached by more than two townhome owners about the encroachment of the three season <br />porch and the lack of privacy this would create. She did not believe there was room for large trees <br />to be planted. She recommended the applicant consider a large wraparound deck. <br /> <br />Mr. Jittila questioned if there was a smaller encroachment that the Council could support. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden was uncertain and stated she would have to see the plans. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked what the timeline for approval was for this project. <br />