My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
06-27-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:09:06 AM
Creation date
7/27/2016 12:30:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 27, 2016 9 <br /> townhomes to the east. A trail easement across the walking path was dedicated on the Fox Ridge <br /> plat. <br /> City Planner Streff commented that due to environmental constraints, the existing house was <br /> placed in the far northeastern corner of the lot near the 30-foot rear yard and 10-foot north side <br /> yard setback lines. The dwelling also required a setback of approximately 73 feet from the front <br /> property line to avoid the drainage and utility easement and conform to structure setback <br /> requirements. In comparison, most of the homes in the Fox Ridge subdivision as well as those on <br /> Keithson Drive to the north of the subject property are setback approximately 40 feet from the <br /> front property line. <br /> City Planner Streff explained the applicants have requested a rear yard setback variance in order <br /> to construct a 216 square foot three-season porch addition on the rear side of the house. The porch <br /> addition would encroach 3 feet — 6 inches into the required 30-foot rear yard setback, creating a <br /> setback of 26 feet — 6 inches from the rear property line. The project would also include a 211 <br /> square foot deck that would be accessed through the new porch addition. In this case, a variance is <br /> only needed for the porch addition as the deck encroachment in the rear yard setback is allowed <br /> under the permitted encroachment provisions in Section 1325.03, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Code. <br /> City Planner Streff reviewed the Plan Evaluation and the Variance Evaluation Criteria. <br /> City Planner Streff stated the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 16-015 at their <br /> regular meeting on June 8, 2016. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact <br /> for consideration: <br /> General Findings: <br /> 1. The property at 1494 Keithson Drive is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential <br /> Zoning District. <br /> 2. The lot is in conformance with the minimum lot size and dimensions for the R-1 District. <br /> 3. The existing conditions on the property are in conformance with the setback and structure <br /> and lot coverage requirements for properties in the R-1 District. <br /> 4. The proposed porch addition would encroach 3 feet — 6 inches into the rear yard setback <br /> creating a setback of 26 feet—6 inches from the rear properly line. The minimum rear yard <br /> setback in the R-1 District is 30 feet. The proposed porch addition would meet all other <br /> setback requirements for the R-1 District. <br /> 5. The proposed deck is in conformance with the Zoning Code as Section 1325.03, <br /> Subdivision 2 (A) permits decks to extend six feet into the rear yard setback as long as the <br /> encroachment is not closer than six feet from the rear lot line. The proposed deck would be <br /> setback 26 feet—6 inches from the rear property line. <br /> 6. All other aspects of the proposed porch and deck addition are in conformance with the <br /> Zoning Code requirements for the R-1 District. <br /> 7. The proposed addition would not encroach on any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. <br /> 8. The proposed addition is not expected to impact any significant trees on the property. <br /> Variance Findings: <br /> 9. The variance would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City's Code because <br /> the impact of the addition on adjacent properties would be mitigated by the location of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.