Laserfiche WebLink
County Road E Trail Improvements <br />October 6, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, and Undersheriff George Altendorfer concur that the proposed <br />improvement to the County Road E bridge would allow for safer movement of pedestrians and <br />bicyclists, regardless of plans for a sidewalk. Mr. Altendorfer indicated that the County is <br />concerned over the safe passage for pedestrians based on the number of Mounds View High <br />School and Bethel University students who walk across the bridge. <br /> <br />The City has received requests to provide safe facilities for pedestrians and cyclists along Lake <br />Johanna Boulevard and Old Highway 10. Both of these roadways are also owned by Ramsey <br />County. Sidewalk or trail improvements along Lake Johanna Boulevard are constrained by <br />limited right-of-way and the lack of curb and gutter along the roadway to provide a safe <br />separation for pedestrians and vehicles. Old Highway 10 includes several areas of steep slopes <br />and also lacks curb and gutter to provide a safe separation for pedestrians and vehicles. In <br />addition, the existing CP Rail bridge provides a significant obstacle to a separate trail or <br />sidewalk along Old Highway 10. Staff has investigated the feasibility of improvements to the CP <br />Rail bridge and has determined that the bridge condition is too poor to make modifications <br />necessary for a sidewalk improvement. The City has relayed this concern to CP Rail and Ramsey <br />County officials. City staff is aware of the concerns for safer walking facilities in both of these <br />areas and will pursue potential improvement opportunities as they arise. <br /> <br />Feasibility Study <br />On January 26, 2004, the Arden Hills City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility <br />study for pedestrian improvements along County Road E, between the TH 51 bridge and Old <br />Highway 10. The feasibility report was presented to the Council on March 8, 2004. The report <br />outlined three options for providing additional bridge width. Option A proposed to reconfigure <br />the lane width and spacing of the roadway to create a 6.5-foot wide sidewalk along one side of <br />the bridge without expanding the width of the existing bridge. The estimated cost of Option A <br />was $60,000. Option B proposed extending the deck support along the southern side of the <br />bridge as well as narrowing the lane widths to facilitate the construction of a 7.5-foot wide <br />sidewalk along one side of the bridge. The estimated cost of Option B was $80,000. Option C <br />proposed a 10-foot wide sidewalk that would require the construction of a parallel beam across <br />TH 51 to widen the bridge deck. In this option, the roadway would remain the same, only one <br />side of the bridge extended for sidewalk construction. Option C would allow for the <br />construction of an interior rail/buffer between the sidewalk and the traffic lanes for additional <br />level of safety. The estimated cost of Option C was $200,000. Several options were also <br />presented to Council concerning additional bridge enhancement options, such as ornamental <br />railing, decorative surface treatments and lighting.