My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-29-16-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
08-29-16-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2024 12:06:23 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 2:26:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—AUGUST 29, 2016 2 <br /> Mayor Grant was in favor of utility bills being certified with the County and that this continue to <br /> be public information. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned how much the City was not collecting in utility bills. <br /> Interim City Administrator Iverson stated the only time the City was not fully collecting on a <br /> utility bill was if a property owner were to file bankruptcy prior to the outstanding bill being <br /> certified by the City Council. This was the reason the City certified its outstanding utilities on a <br /> quarterly basis. <br /> Councilmember Holden believed that if certain residents wanted their utility bills to be certified <br /> to the County on their property tax statements,the City should continue this practice. <br /> Councilmember McClung suggested that a letter be provided to residents notifying them that if <br /> outstanding utility amounts are not paid in full, the information will be made public and the <br /> outstanding amount will be certified to the County. <br /> Interim City Administrator Iverson discussed the letters that were already being sent by the <br /> C ity. <br /> Councilmember Wicklund requested staff forward these letters to the Council for further review. <br /> B. County Road E Bridge Pedestrian Lighting Review <br /> Acting Public Works Director Anderson stated on March 28, 2016, the City Council directed <br /> staff to proceed with contracting for installation of lighting on the County Rd E/T1151 bridge. The <br /> staff memo on this item was specific in its description that the lighting was intended to light the <br /> pedestrian facility on the south side of the bridge. The contractor has installed the lighting and <br /> Councilmember Holmes brought forward a concern that the lights should cover more of the bridge <br /> surface and that her understanding was the lights would cover more of the bridge. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if additional lights would be placed on the County Road E <br /> Bridge. <br /> Councilmember Wicklund believed the existing lights were adequate given the level of <br /> pedestrian traffic on this bridge. <br /> Mayor Grant stated he has seen the lights and indicated they were not very bright. <br /> Councilmember Holmes explained the lights were adequate for the south side of the bridge, but <br /> not for the north side of the bridge. She commented she does see Bethel or high school students <br /> walking along the north side of the bridge fairly often. She stated it was her expectation that the <br /> entire bridge would be properly lit by the newly installed lighting. She suggested brighter bulbs <br /> be installed in the existing light poles. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned how North St. Paul received funding for their bridge <br /> aesthetics. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.