Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 6/22/2016 <br />Securing Payment of Utility Charges Page 37 <br /> <br /> Another form of security that is mutually agreed on between the utility and <br />the debtor or the trustee, but an administrative expense priority does not <br />constitute an assurance of payment. On request of a party and after notice <br />and a hearing, the court may order modification of the amount of an <br />assurance of payment. On request of a party in interest and after notice and <br />a hearing, the court may order reasonable modification of the amount of <br />the deposit or other security necessary to provide adequate assurance of <br />payment. <br /> B. Other types of bankruptcy <br />11 U.S.C.A. 366(b). For other bankruptcy proceedings, a city can terminate utility service to the <br />property twenty days from the date of the filing unless the owner or <br />bankruptcy trustee provides a deposit or some other assurance of payment <br />for continued utility service. <br /> <br />26 U.S.C.A. § 6321. <br /> <br />26 U.S.C.A. § 6323. <br />In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, an individual debtor typically attempts to <br />discharge all debts incurred before filing. However, certified unpaid utility <br />charges are a valid tax lien, and may have priority over other liens. IRS <br />liens most likely take precedence over liens related to unpaid charges for <br />utilities. <br /> C. State law <br />Minn. Stat. § 514.67. <br />In Re Lanford, 10 B.R. 129 <br />(U.S.B.C. D. Minn. 1981). <br />In re Sheldahl, Inc., 298 <br />B.R. 874, (Bankr. D. Minn. <br />2003). <br />In addition, state law makes governmental services a prior lien in <br />bankruptcy proceedings by operation of law, although once a person files <br />under the bankruptcy code, federal law takes precedence over state law. In <br />one case, the bankruptcy panel upheld a city’s claim for payment of unpaid <br />utility charges against a debtor under a statutory lien theory. <br /> XVI. Conclusion <br /> Municipal utilities may develop reasonable charges and may <br />simultaneously use a variety of tools and procedures to secure payment for <br />valid utility charges. Developing a process, with clear timelines and ample <br />notice provisions will increase collection of utility charges. The city utility <br />ordinance should mirror the process, timelines and notice provisions a <br />utility uses to seek payment for utility charges. <br />