Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 3, 2016 3 <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth asked if the new bathroom facilities would be ADA compliant. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reported this would be reviewed by the City Building Official at the <br />time a building permit was requested. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones clarified that the symbols and dimensions on the plans show that the new <br />bathroom facilities would be ADA compliant. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson asked if the new door was an emergency exit. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler deferred this question to the applicant. <br />Casey Beaton, Manager of Store Planning for Holiday Stationstores, reported the restrooms <br />would be fully ADA compliant. He indicated the additional door was needed to meet fire exit <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth understood construction would begin in October. <br /> <br />Mr. Beaton estimated the construction timeline would be nine weeks. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson questioned if Holiday Stationstores had any concerns about the conditions <br />recommended for approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Beaton supported the conditions for approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones moved and Commissioner Neururer seconded a motion to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case 16-019 for a PUD Amendment and CUP Amendment at 1920 <br />West Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the six <br />(6) conditions in the August 3, 2016, Report to the Planning Commission. The motion <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br />