Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 7, 2016 4 <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Larson stated she had completed a grading plan. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson requested further information on how water runoff from the roof would be <br />managed. <br /> <br />Jennifer Otto, Kootenia Homes, reported the home would have gutters and downspouts along <br />with a drain tile system. She explained the elevation of the new home would be brought up to <br />assist with the grading concerns while also eliminating the steep grade of the driveway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel discussed the City’s impervious surface requirements noting the lot could <br />have no more than 35% of the property covered. He was pleased that this property would only <br />have 20% impervious coverage. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson indicated she lived on a low lot and had a pump to assist with removing the <br />sewer from her home. She asked if staff was comfortable with the sewer and drainage for the <br />site. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler explained both the City Engineer and Building Official reviewed the <br />plans and there were no concerns at this time. He notes a Building Permit and Grading and <br />Erosion Control Permit would be required prior to construction. <br />Commissioner Neururer believed the applicant was proposing to build a beautiful home. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bartel was pleased to see the letters of support from the neighboring property <br />owners. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames supported the request and was thankful the applicant was requesting very <br />minimal variances. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson believed the proposed home was a great use of the property. She thanked the <br />applicant for providing the Commission with the home elevations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames moved and Commissioner Zimmerman seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 16-022 for a Variance at 1500 Arden Place based on <br />the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the six (6) conditions in the <br />September 7, 2016, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously <br />(7-0). <br /> <br />