Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 2 <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />reported this was the case, but would not correct ongoing operating shortages. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the City would have any additional savings in 2016. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />anticipated the City would have additional savings due to reduced salaries. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden understood these overages could be placed in the PIR fund. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />stated this has been the practice of the Council. She cautioned the Council about depending on <br />the PIR fund to balance the budget. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the PIR Fund and budget transfers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund understood the City had $565,000 in reserves that could be <br />transferred to balance the budget. He believed the budget was very conservative and asked how <br />staff felt about covering more of their own health care expenses. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />discussed the comments she has received from staff regarding health care expenses and noted <br />there were some bitter feelings about the past changes over the last two years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund asked how much the budget would be impacted by returning to the <br />50/50 split in the increase over the previous years’ premium for the healthcare expenses. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />stated this would not be a significant increase. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund did not support the 60/40 split and believed this action would only <br />deteriorate morale. He wanted to see the City take care of its employees. He commented he did <br />not want to dip into reserves and stated he would therefore gravitate towards a 7.6% tax levy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes agreed. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant did not support this high of an increase. He commented on the proposed budget <br />increases noting he wanted the City to be cautious that costs were not being raised too high. He <br />stated he could support a 4.7% tax levy increase and felt this was a balanced approach to the <br />budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how long Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and <br />Administrative Services Iverson had been with the City. <br /> <br />Interim City Administrator and Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson <br />reported she has been with the City for 10 years. <br />