My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
12-12-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 12:42:27 PM
Creation date
12/12/2016 8:40:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 14, 2016 3 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant requested the first questions be reworded to ask what the public likes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden suggested the reference to TCAAP being a once in a lifetime project be <br />changed to read a critically important development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked what natural and historic features were being honored on the <br />TCAAP site. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang recommended the word historic be removed. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the survey questions and the talking points for the open <br />house. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden requested the developer address a pedestrian connection to ensure <br />TCAAP was connected to the remainder of Arden Hills. She feared that TCAAP would only be <br />pedestrian friendly within TCAAP. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes feared that residents would misunderstand the uses that would be <br />located in the Town Center and encouraged staff to remind the public that the boards being <br />presented were concept plans. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant requested the return on investment language be removed from Item 10. He <br />reiterated that the spine road was to be owned by the County. He recommended the language <br />regarding the Civic area be rewritten. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the City’s goal was to have up to 10% of the units within <br />TCAAP be affordable. <br /> <br />The Council offered additional direction and clarification to staff on the talking points. <br /> <br />B. TCAAP Park Costs <br /> <br />Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Brotzler explained staff had been developing <br />high level park costs for Creek, Town Center and Hill Parks. The cost estimates were reviewed in <br />detail with the Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang discussed the TCAAP park plans within the TRC. She explained staff had tried to <br />complete a high-level park plan and noted the numbers were reviewed with the developer. She <br />explained a formal plan was not in place and noted all numbers were estimates. It was noted a <br />20% contingency was included in the estimates. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the difference was between a park building and a picnic <br />shelter. <br /> <br />Alex Duval, Duval Development, explained a park building would be an enclosed building with <br />flush toilets, while a picnic shelter would be an open air pavilion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.