My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-31-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
10-31-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2016 9:56:46 AM
Creation date
12/30/2016 9:56:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — OCTOBER 31, 2016 10 <br />Councilmember Holmes did not see why MedExpress should be required to put in a sidewalk <br />when they do not own the land. <br />Councilmember Holden stated Arden Plaza owns this property and the Council was being asked <br />to approve an Arden Plaza PUD. <br />Mayor Grant questioned the length of the requested sidewalk. <br />Senior Planner Bachler estimated the sidewalk would be three or four feet in length. <br />Councilmember Holden requested the Council not miss this opportunity to make a valuable <br />sidewalk connection. <br />Councilmember Holmes did not object to having a sidewalk at this location. However, she <br />questioned who would be paying for the sidewalk. <br />Mayor Grant anticipated the owner of the property would work this out with MedExpress. <br />Councilmember Holmes called the question. <br />The amendment failed 2-3 (Holmes, McClung and Wicklund opposed). <br />Councilmember Holden did not believe that marked crosswalks could be required if a sidewalk <br />could not be required. <br />Mayor Grant questioned if the Council could make a recommendation regarding the crosswalk. <br />Senior Planner Bachler indicated that staff would work with the City Attorney to address this <br />within the Development Agreement. <br />Mayor Grant recommended that the pedestrian crossing issue be addressed within the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Councilmember McClung suggested the sidewalk connection also be considered within the <br />Development Agreement. <br />The Council was in agreement. <br />Councilmember Holden requested Condition 18 be added stating: The tower lights will only be <br />lit during hours of operation. <br />AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember McClung <br />seconded an amendment adding Condition 18 to read: The tower lights <br />will only be lit during hours of operation. <br />Mr. Fleischman asked if there was an Ordinance that would restrict the operation of these lights <br />overnight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.