Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 28, 2016 6 <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented the City’s standards were set by the market. <br /> <br />Mr. Lux described how the rental market had changed over the past few years and noted renters <br />were looking for smaller units with numerous amenities available onsite. He requested the <br />Council allow him to react to the numbers and that he be allowed to respond at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden supported the numbers being written into the TRC. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned if the TRC should be forwarded to the Planning <br />Commission if the developer hasn’t had a chance to respond to this matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant believed the TRC could move forward and receive comment from the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung suggested the TRC move forward as is without the numbers, with the <br />understanding Arden Hills City Code would apply. He indicated the developer could then <br />respond to this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Lux looked forward to discussing this item with his team and reporting back to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Interim City Planner Zweber discussed the frontage requirements and Town Center specific <br />issues with the Council. He discussed the proposed restaurants and retail planned for the Town <br />Center and requested comment from the Council on the proper line for office and retail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden believed additional office should be considered. She had the <br />understanding that higher paying jobs were associated with office versus retail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the Council wanted to see more office. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the retail, commercial and office uses within TCAAP. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if the line had to be horizontal. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund questioned what the Council wanted for these two areas so the main <br />issues can be addressed and a solution can be found. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the area is currently divided 50/50. The reason for this was <br />because commercial property brought in more per square foot and higher paying jobs. She <br />recommended the parcels not be zoned based on speculation. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung was willing to accept the office/retail line on Attachment A as is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes had an issue with the proposed restaurants. She indicated the space was <br />zoned for restaurants and parking and feared restaurants may not come to this portion of the <br />development. <br />