Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for April 5, 2017 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Findings of Fact <br /> <br />Staff offers the following findings of fact for review: <br /> <br />General Findings: <br />1. The property at 3517 Siems Court is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning <br />District. <br />2. The lot is a conforming lot within the R-1 District. <br />3. The applicants have proposed taking down the existing dwelling on the property and <br />constructing a new single-family dwelling. <br />4. The proposed principal structure would encroach 15 feet into the front yard setback, <br />creating a setback of 25 feet from the Siems Court property line. The minimum front yard <br />setback in the R-1 District is 40 feet. <br />5. All other aspects of the proposed construction are in conformance with the Zoning Code <br />requirements for the R-1 District. <br />6. The proposed dwelling would not encroach on any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. <br /> <br />Variance Findings: <br />7. The variance would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City’s Code <br />because the dwelling would be constructed in a location to preserve the property’s natural <br />features and neighboring views of Lake Johanna. <br />8. The variance would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan because it meets <br />the City’s housing goal of encouraging property reinvestment that complements and <br />enhances the character of the City’s established neighborhoods. <br />9. The proposed construction of a new single-family dwelling is a reasonable use of the <br />property that would not be allowed under the rules of the Zoning Code without the <br />requested variance. <br />10. The property is unique and presents development challenges because of its topography. <br />The unique characteristics of the property were not created by the property owners. <br />11. The proposed dwelling would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood <br />because it would result in a structure that is consistent and compatible with other <br />construction in the area. <br />12. The requested variance does not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, staff recommends approval of Planning Case <br />17-007 for a Variance at 3517 Siems Court. If the Planning Commission votes to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case 17-007, staff is recommending the following four (4) conditions of <br />approval: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by