Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION – NOVEMBER 9, 2011 4 <br /> <br />C. All renovations must be in compliance with the Americans with <br />Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames commented that she believes we will see more of the private park space <br />in future development. She also commented that she likes the way White Bear Lake names their <br />open space as Open Space Conservation District and Public Facilities District. <br />Chair Larson asked if the City could end up owning private park space eventually. <br />City Planner Beekman responded the City can zone privately owned property as private park <br />space. The private park space issues would be addressed as a part of the negotiations with the <br />developer at the beginning of the process. <br />Chair Larson questioned if it would be difficult to convince a private property owner to have <br />their land zoned as Conservation District because it would diminish the value of the land. <br />City Planner Beekman responded that those details are worked out at the beginning of the <br />development. <br />Chair Larson stated there is a key phrase in City Planner Beekman’s memo which states “give <br />the City additional flexibility to allow for unanticipated uses in the future.” He was concerned <br />that allowing “unanticipated uses” in an open space district could be a negative. <br />City Planner Beekman clarified that she is not suggesting the Commission retroactively rezone <br />privately owned land for park or open space. The important focus of this discussion is how to <br />deal with our existing park land. <br />Commissioner Holewa commented that there is reference to county parks but the City doesn’t <br />have control over county park property. <br />City Planner Beekman explained that the City does have control over the zoning in county <br />property within City limits. <br />Commissioner Holewa questioned the wording in the first paragraph of the proposed ordinance; <br />specifically the reference to “unsuitable for development.” <br />Discussion ensued and the general consensus was to reword that sentence to state that the <br />property has been deemed valuable to the community as park or open space. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman agreed that some word-smithing is necessary. He also objected to <br />some of the items listed as uses such as trash receptacles, public announcement system, and <br />exterior signage. <br />Chair Larson stated he is concerned about listing community center as a use because that can be <br />a very large facility. <br />Commissioner Holewa objected to including the statement “City-owned facilities” in the list of <br />permitted uses. <br />City Planner Beekman pointed out that there are Public Works facilities in our City parks.