Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 9, 2012 7 <br /> <br />6. The Zoning Code specifies criteria for waiving the 1,320 feet separation requirement. <br />7. The proposal meets all criteria specified in the Zoning Code for waiving the 1,320- <br />foot separation requirement. <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Findings <br /> <br />8. The proposal will not negatively impact traffic flow or parking on the site because the <br />modifications to the parking are minimal, and the pharmacy is a pre-existing use. <br />Furthermore, the site is sufficiently large, with traffic circulation patterns in place to <br />handle large amount of traffic and parking demand. <br />9. The proposal will not permanently change noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, <br />air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste. <br />10. The proposal will not affect drainage on the property. <br />11. The proposal will not affect the population density on the property. <br />12. The proposal would not be incompatible with the other buildings in the B-3 Zone. <br />13. The proposal is unlikely to significantly affect land values on the subject property or <br />on neighboring properties. <br />14. The park dedication requirement does not apply in this application. <br /> <br />Signage Findings <br /> <br />15. The original PUD was approved for the following signage: Wall signage; 678 square <br />feet; Monument sign: 100 square feet; Total: 778 square feet. <br />16. The City granted 40 square feet of additional signage in 2007. <br />17. The proposed sign plan would increase the amount of signage on the property by <br />163.54 square feet. The pharmacy sign on the front of the building would be <br />replaced, and a new pharmacy sign would be located on the south side of the <br />property. <br />18. There are no site conditions that exist that if additional signage is allowed will make <br />the proposed or existing signage on the building reasonable visible from adjacent <br />property. <br />19. The building and the services offered within it are reasonably visible to adjacent <br />streets within the existing signage allotment for the property. <br />20. Additional signage will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the <br />zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use. <br /> <br />City Planner Meagan Beekman reviewed the Zoning Requirements. Currently there are <br />three drive-up windows within 1,320 feet of property. <br /> <br />City Planner Meagan Beekman stated notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview <br />Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City and mailed to residents within one thousand <br />(1000) feet of the subject property. Staff has not received any letters, emails, or <br />telephone calls from property owners or occupants in regard to this planning case. <br /> <br />Chair Larson questioned signage and asked how the square footage of the sign is <br />measured. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the size is determined by drawing the <br />smallest possible box around the sign, in which the entire sign fits. The size of the sign is <br />the dimensions of the box. Commissioner Zimmerman stated he was on the Commission <br />at the time Cub was constructed and comparisons were made to adjacent projects for the <br />signage size permitted. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the previous signage was