Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 8, 2012 2 <br /> <br />yard setback below the required 15 feet, reduce the lot landscaped area below the <br />minimum of 65 percent and increase the structural lot coverage area above the maximum <br />of 25 percent. <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Matt Horton reviewed the applicant is the owner of the <br />home. The property is located in the R-3 District and was constructed within the <br />Hunter’s Park PUD development. He provided aerial photographs of the property, <br />ground level photographs and a site plan. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a proposal to construct a 574 square foot addition to his <br />home. This proposal is substantially similar to a variance request that was made by the <br />property owner, and approved by the City, in 2007, but which was never built. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the variance criteria (Attachment A), an <br />aerial of the property with the addition drawn in, and elevations of the proposed addition <br />(Attachment C). <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Matt Horton offered the following sixteen findings of <br />fact for review: <br /> <br />General Findings <br />1. Although the 8,250 square foot lot was approved as part of the Hunters Park PUD, it <br />does not meet the minimum requirements of the R-3 Zone. <br />2. The existing dwelling meets all property line setbacks. The existing detached garage <br />encroaches on the front yard and southern side yard setbacks. <br />3. The proposed addition would reduce the combined side yard setbacks from 17.5 feet <br />to 11.5 feet. The southern side yard setback would be reduced from 11.5 feet to 5 <br />feet. The northern side yard setback would remain at 6 feet. A variance is required if <br />the two side setbacks do not equal 15 feet or more. <br />4. The proposed addition does not encroach on the rear or front setbacks. <br />5. The structure coverage is proposed to increase from 18.9 percent to 27.0 percent of <br />the lot. A variance is required to exceed 25 percent structure coverage on the lot. <br />6. The landscape area would be reduced from 65.1 percent to 60.7 percent of the lot. A <br />variance is required to reduce landscape area below 65 percent. <br />7. The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. <br />8. Dwellings are permitted structures within the R-3 Zone. <br />9. The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood <br />plain, wetlands and easements. <br />10. The Planning Commission and City Council approved a substantially similar proposal <br />for the property in 2007. <br /> <br />Variance Findings <br />11. A dwelling and addition are reasonable uses within the R-3 Zone. <br />12. The nonconforming lot size for the R-3 Zone, which was approved as part of the <br />PUD, and the substantial amount of shared open space that is part of the development, <br />may present a unique situation that warrants the requested variances. There are no <br />unique topographical conditions. <br />13. It is unlikely the proposed addition would have a negative impact on the property or <br />the neighborhood. The addition will not reduce the northern side yard setback, and <br />the southern property line is adjacent to common space that is owned by the Hunters