Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – August 3, 2016 9 <br /> <br />• The law would supersede existing land use regulations in the City Code related to <br />accessory structures. Though the statute would require that the accessory dwelling units <br />comply with the City’s setback requirements that apply to the principal structure on the <br />property, it does not address lot coverage, drainage, and shoreland requirements. <br /> <br />• The law requires applicants to provide proof of adequate septic service management. City <br />staff has concerns about the feasibility of providing safe, temporary septic services to <br />these types of structure and what the process would be for enforcement and mitigation if <br />there were a failure in these services. <br /> <br />• The law stipulates that applications must include proof of the provider network providing <br />the primary care for the resident in the dwelling unit, and written certification of the need <br />for assistance from a medical professional. This requirement places a burden on City staff <br />to review and properly manage this type of private medical documentation. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reported that the City Council discussed this item at their Work Session <br />on July 18, 2016, and directed staff and the City Attorney to draft an opt-out Ordinance. A draft <br />of Ordinance Number 2016-07 was reviewed. The Ordinance would amend Section 1325.01 <br />(Accessory Structures) of the Zoning Code to add Subdivision 8, which would specifically <br />exempt the City from following the provisions in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3593 <br />regarding temporary family health care accessory dwellings. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler provided the Findings of Fact for review: <br /> <br />1. The Minnesota State legislature passed a bill in the 2016 session establishing a new <br />permitting process for temporary family health care accessory dwellings, codified as <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3593. <br />2. The law allows cities to opt-out of the law if an Ordinance is approved before it goes into <br />effect on September 1, 2016. <br />3. The City has elected to opt-out of the law due to concerns regarding the impact of the law <br />on public health and safety and its desire to maintain its existing land use controls. <br />4. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler recommended approval of Ordinance Number 2016-07 in Planning <br />Case 16-020 to opt-out of the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3593 regarding <br />temporary family health care accessory dwellings, as presented in the August 3, 2016, report to <br />the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />2. Recommend Approval with Changes <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br />