09-07-2016 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 7, 2016 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-022 - 1500 Arden Place - Variance\Memos_Reports_16-022 Page 8 of 9 6. The property owners shall provide 17.6 caliper inches of new tree plantings per the submitted Tree Preservation Plan prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for the dwelling. Deciduous trees shall be a minimum of 2.5 caliper inches in size, and coniferous trees a minimum of 6 feet in height. Proposed Motion Language 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 16-022 for a variance at 1500 Arden Place, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the six conditions in the September 7, 2016, Report to the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 16- 022 for a variance at 1500 Arden Place, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans in the September 7, 2016, Report to the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 16-022 for a variance at 1500 Arden Place based on the following findings of fact: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 16-022 for a variance at 1500 Arden Place: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property. Public Comments The City has received letters of support for the requested variance from the following property owners: 1455, 1466, 1475, 1480 Skiles Lane, and 1485, 1492, 1532, 1540, 1545, 1548 Arden Place. All ten of these properties are within 350 feet of 1500 Arden Place. 1492 Arden Place is the adjacent property located to the east of the subject property. A copy of each of the support letters have been provided in Attachment G. The City has not received any public comments opposing the proposed variance.