Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for November 9, 2016 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Two variances are also being requested. The first is to allow a 5 foot deviation from Section <br />1320.06 District Requirements Chart of city code, which requires a lot width of 95 feet. The <br />second variance is to allow a deviation from the requirement in Section 1150.04 of city code, <br />which requires that requests for subdivision meet the required dimensions in order to be eligible <br />for division. <br /> <br />2. Surrounding Area: <br />Direction Future Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use <br />North LDR – Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential <br />South LDR – Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential <br />East LDR – Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential <br />West LDR – Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential <br /> <br /> <br />3. Site Data: <br />Future Land Use Plan: LDR- Low Density Residential <br />Existing Land Use: Single Family House/Vacant <br />Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential <br />Lot Size: Current - 40,332 sq. ft <br />Proposed 23,064 sq. ft and 17,268 sq. ft <br />Topography: 10 foot drop over 210 feet (5% easterly slope) <br /> <br /> <br />Plan Evaluation <br /> <br />1. Section 1150.04 Division or Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record <br />The City Code requires compliance with the following criteria in order to be considered <br />for a minor subdivision of previously platted lots: <br /> <br />• The owner(s) of the platted lot(s) to be so divided or consolidated shall file with <br />the zoning administrator a survey or registered land survey of the lot(s) to be <br />divided or consolidated. Criterion met. <br />• The parcels or tracts resulting from the division or consolidation, as depicted in <br />the survey or registered land survey, shall not have an area, dimensions or <br />setbacks which are less than the minimum requirements specified for the zoning <br />district in which the parcels or tracts are located in the zoning ordinance. <br />Criterion not met. A variance is needed. <br />• It is determined that the proposed division or consolidation will not be detrimental <br />to the public welfare or injurious to adjacent tracts in the area in which the <br />subdivision tract is located. Criterion met.