My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2017 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2017
>
03-08-2017 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2017 12:12:23 PM
Creation date
6/7/2017 12:11:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 8, 2017 7 <br /> <br />• New Brighton: No animation or video is permitted and a minimum duration of 8 <br />seconds. <br />• Shoreview: No animation or video is permitted and a minimum duration of 8 <br />seconds. <br />• Mounds View: Must be static and remain for a minimum duration of 8 seconds. <br />• TCAAP Redevelopment Code: Allowed only on “Marquee Signs.” A Marquee <br />Sign is located at a theatre or other public venue and displays the name of the <br />establishment or event details. Message board may be changeable copy provided <br />that the copy does not change more than once every 15 minutes. <br /> <br />Ms. Rybak commented the Sign Code defines a projecting sign as a sign, other than a wall sign, <br />that projects more than 18 inches from the building façade. These types of signs are not permitted <br />in Arden Hills, New Brighton, or Shoreview. Roseville regulates them as a wall sign, and they <br />may only project up to 30 inches from the building façade. Mounds View allows them with a set <br />square footage by zoning district. The TCAAP Redevelopment Code allows the lesser of a set <br />square footage or 15% of the façade area. They may project no more than 50% of the width of the <br />sidewalk, or six feet from the building façade line, whichever is less. <br /> <br />Ms. Rybak explained for temporary signs, Arden Hills allows up to half of the area allowed for <br />permanent wall or freestanding signage to be displayed on three occasions throughout the year, <br />with a maximum of 10 days each time. Businesses may also combine the three occasions to <br />display a temporary sign for one 30-day period per year. Other cities’ regulations are as follows: <br /> <br />• Roseville: Allows a maximum of 32 square feet up to 60 days in one year. <br />• New Brighton: Allows up to 32 square feet on four occasions, up to 14 days each. <br />• Shoreview: Allows either 32 or 64 square feet (depending on building size) on <br />four occasions, up to 14 days each. <br />• Mounds View: Allows temporary signage on four occasions, with a maximum of <br />21 days each. Can obtain a fifth permit for a banner only. <br />• TCAAP Redevelopment Code: Maximum area of 150 square feet or 10% of the <br />façade area, whichever is less. Maximum of thirty days per calendar year. <br /> <br />Ms. Rybak stated based on the direction provided by the Planning Commission, staff will <br />complete additional research on possible revisions to the Sign Code. Staff will bring this item <br />back to the Planning Commission for further discussion and review recommendations with the <br />City Council before a public hearing is scheduled for any changes to the Sign Code. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson stated she was interested in learning more about dynamic display signs. She <br />indicated she was not necessarily against dynamic display signs if they were well designed and <br />not distracting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames explained the restrictions on dynamic display signs in the Sign Code <br />were brought about due to electronic billboards that were being introduced in the Twin Cities <br />several years ago. She encouraged the City to differentiate between these large signs and the <br />smaller scale dynamic display signs. She recommended the City not have two separate Sign <br />Codes, one for TCAAP and one for the remainder of the City. She suggested the Sign Code be <br />consistent for all areas of the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.