My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-05-15 JDA
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
01-05-15 JDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2017 11:55:05 AM
Creation date
6/12/2017 11:54:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br /> <br />Joint Development Authority <br /> TCAAP Redevelopment Project <br />Comparison to Ryan Plan <br /> <br />The following table compares acreages, unit numbers and density between the Ryan Plan and the <br />current redevelopment plan. The Ryan numbers are from July 2008 shortly prior to Ryan’s withdrawal <br />from the project. <br /> <br />Table 1 – Land Use Acreage Comparison <br />Land Use Ryan Plan Current Plan <br />Road ROW 55.3 25.2 <br />Parks, Open Space & Natural Resources 167.9 64.3 <br />Residential 168.3 170.8 <br />Retail 61.2 21.6 <br />Other C/I 127.3 147.6 <br />Total 580.0 429.5 <br /> <br />Notes: <br />1. ROW for the Ryan Plan includes collectors, parkways, and commercial streets but does not <br />include streets within residential neighborhoods. ROW for the current plan includes the Spine <br />Road but does not include any other streets. <br />2. Parks, open space, and natural resources for the Ryan Plan include the primer/tracer area and <br />the wildlife corridor. <br /> <br />The following table compares unit types, numbers of units, and density between the Ryan Plan and the <br />current plan. For the purpose of simplifying the comparison, it was assumed that all units in the <br />Hill/Creek neighborhoods would be single-family and all units in the Transition neighborhood would be <br />townhomes. When development occurs, it is likely that some townhomes will be built in the Hill <br />neighborhood and some small single-family homes will be built in the Transition neighborhood. <br /> <br />Table 2 – Residential Unit Comparison <br />Ryan Plan Current Plan <br />Unit Type # of units Acres Average <br />density <br />Unit type # of units Acres Average <br />density <br />Single Family 320 103.9 3.08 Hill/Creek 420 108.9 3.9 <br />Townhomes 470 41.6 11.3 Transition 470 46.9 9.8 <br />Apartments, <br />Condos, and <br />Senior <br />960 22.77 42.2 Town <br />Center <br />600 15.0 40.0 <br />Total 1,750 168.3 10.4 Total 1,490 170.8 8.7 <br /> <br />As noted above, ROW for the Ryan Plan includes collectors, parkways, and commercial streets. If these <br />streets were excluded from the acreage in the current plan, the acreage would decrease and the overall <br />density would likely increase somewhat. The most significant difference between the Ryan Plan and the <br />current plan is that the Ryan Plan had fewer single-family homes and more acreage devoted to high-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.