My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-03-15 JDA
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
08-03-15 JDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2017 12:03:45 PM
Creation date
6/12/2017 12:03:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Development Director’s Report <br />Development Director Hutmacher reviewed the TCAAP Redevelopment Code with the JDA. She <br />discussed the work the City had completed on the TCAAP Master plan since November of 2012 <br />to the present. It was noted that through public comments and open houses, the City <br />gathered input on community preferences for TCAAP development. <br /> <br />Development Director Hutmacher indicated that residents want to see TCAAP developed in a <br />similar style as the rest of the City but with a few notable differences: <br /> <br />1. Residents felt that TCAAP should meet the needs and desires of younger generations. <br />2. Residents wanted a walkable pedestrian friendly community with neighborhoods <br />connected to each other and to convenient retail, services, and entertainment. <br />3. Residents wanted a wider variety of housing options to serve young professionals, <br />empty nesters and seniors. <br />4. Nearly everyone shared the view that TCAAP should be developed as a special place <br />with high-quality development and amenities. <br /> <br />Development Director Hutmacher explained that the City Council wanted to avoid creating a <br />plan that was undevelopable in the market. The Council held discussions with representatives <br />of commercial/industrial, retail, multi-family, single-family and senior markets. From these <br />discussions, the Council learned: <br /> <br />• Residential mixed-use is not supported by the market. Multi-family developers <br />considered mixed-use requirements, particularly in the suburbs, as a serious <br />disincentive and a barrier to development. <br />• Quality multi-family development in suburban locations would likely need tax increment <br />financing or other subsidies to close the gap between construction costs and lease <br />revenues. This was recently demonstrated with the approval of $7 million in TIF for a <br />484-unit multi-family development in Brooklyn Park. <br />• Arden Hills is a desirable location for single-family homes due to the quality and <br />reputation of the Mounds View School District. Developers and school district <br />representatives agreed that families with school-age children are most likely to live in <br />single-family homes. Townhomes and apartments do not appear to be preferred <br />housing products for young families. <br />• Arden Hills is also a desirable location for empty-nester housing as residents choose to <br />downsize from their existing homes, but stay in the community. Empty-nesters desire <br />smaller, one level homes with upgraded features and maintenance-free living. Popular <br />empty-nester products include twin homes and attached and detached townhomes. <br />• The Council heard from commercial/industrial developers that amenities, proximity to <br />retail, services and trails, are very important to attract businesses. Businesses even use <br />proximity to amenities as a recruiting tool.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.