Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS EDA MEETING – APRIL 28, 2014 6 <br />projects. Consider exempting projects receiving financing through the RLF from being <br />reviewed using this evaluation tool. <br /> The job creation requirements in the existing RLF Guidelines should be revised <br />considering that certain projects such as façade improvements and equipment acquisition <br />may not meet this required criteria. <br /> Be willing to take on some risk recognizing that the City will likely see a direct benefit <br />from a completed project regardless of whether the loan is repaid in full (for example, <br />improvements to landscaping or public frontage façades). <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler explained that the application process for obtaining revolving loan <br />funds should be streamlined and transparent. The City should set a goal of completing the <br />necessary evaluation and deciding on a loan request within 30 to 45 days of receiving a <br />completed application. A long approval process will make the program less attractive to <br />businesses interested in participating. While the City should request financial records from the <br />applicant, if possible these documents should not be included in the public records for meetings. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated that the City should consider establishing a special committee <br />comprised of members of the EDA, the EDC, and staff that would be responsible for evaluating <br />applications and making recommendations to the City Council. A detailed list of criteria should <br />be created so that businesses have a level of certainty that a project will be approved by the City <br />Council if it successfully makes it through the committee approval process and meets the <br />required criteria. A schedule similar to the one used by the City to process land use applications <br />could be developed so applicants are aware of the loan approval timeline from the beginning. <br />Because the City is unlikely to receive a large number of loan applications, this committee could <br />have a set regular meeting time every month, but only convene on an as needed basis. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler requested that the EDA provide feedback and direction on proposed <br />changes to the EDA Revolving Loan Fund. <br /> <br />EDA Commissioner Holden questioned how grants were factored into this program. <br /> <br />Executive Director Hutmacher reported that there were not a lot of grants available for <br />businesses, and that any grant a business received would not change the requirement that the <br />City’s loan be a match to private bank financing. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler believed that the City would be willing to partner with businesses on <br />a loan if they had also received a grant to help finance a project. <br /> <br />EDA Commissioner Holden thought that this was a great policy for existing Arden Hills <br />businesses, but did not want to see it made available to new businesses on the TCAAP site. <br /> <br />EDA President Grant agreed and suggested that applications for the revolving loan fund go <br />through the EDC, with recommendations then made to the EDA. <br />