My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-02-15 EDC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
>
EDC Packets
>
2015
>
12-02-15 EDC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2017 4:16:41 PM
Creation date
6/13/2017 4:16:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EDC Minutes <br />October 7, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />positive follow-up survey participation rate by those businesses that took part in the in-person visit <br />as well as by several businesses that elected not to participate in the in-person visit. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued about two or three companies with space needs, potential grant opportunities <br />afforded to businesses through Ramsey County, and the need to retain growing companies in <br />Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Mr. Weinhagen stated that a consultant from Washington D.C. that had recently participated in <br />an economic development workshop pertaining to Ramsey County had been hired to review the <br />Arden Hills BRE program data and provide input for the final report. <br /> <br />Commissioner von Holtum stated he received concerns from some members of the business <br />community that are trying to expand. <br /> <br />Chair Heikkila asked if there have been any surprises as a result of the site visits. <br /> <br />Mr. Weinhagen stated there have been no surprises, but some themes are emerging. One theme is <br />the need for local government and the business community to work as partners in creating an <br />environment which fosters growth. He also stated this situation is not unique to Arden Hills. <br /> <br />A discussion then ensued about space needs, vacancies, aging building inventory, walkability and <br />how to facilitate business retention in general. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler indicated the expectation is that all pending visits will be completed <br />within the next three (3) weeks. <br /> <br />Mr. Weinhagen briefly outlined the components of the report and stated a draft of the report will <br />be provided to the EDC at the beginning of January 2016 with the final report being provided to <br />the EDA and City Council at the end of January 2016. <br /> <br />Commissioner Radziej asked about the City of Minneapolis’ proposed changes to paid time off <br />and work schedule notifications. <br /> <br />Commissioner von Holtum offered a personal perspective about how this change could affect an <br />individual close to him as well as his past experiences in business. <br /> <br />A short discussion ensued about the proposal and how the Working Family Agenda could <br />potentially affect employees and businesses in general elsewhere. <br /> <br />B. State of the City Report <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler provided a recap of attendance (which was lower than last year) and <br />anticipated associated costs for the State of the City events. He asked for feedback from the EDC <br />on the State of the City events as well as for suggestions as far as the layout and content of the <br />presentation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.