My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-17-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
06-26-17-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2017 4:37:17 PM
Creation date
6/22/2017 4:32:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 7, 2017 3 <br /> <br />3. A PUD Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and executed prior to the <br />issuance of any City development permits. <br />4. All necessary City permits for the addition shall be obtained within one year of approval <br />by the City Council, or an extension request shall be submitted in writing to the City at <br />least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date. <br />5. Final construction plans shall be subject to approval by the City Building Official, City <br />Engineer, and Fire Marshall prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. <br />6. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits, including, but not limited to, NPDES and <br />Rice Creek Watershed District. Copies of all necessary permits shall be submitted to the <br />City prior to the issuance of any development permits. <br />7. The applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125% of the estimated costs <br />of landscaping prior to the issuance of any development permits. The financial surety <br />shall be in the form of a letter of credit issued by a FDIC-insured bank. The purpose of <br />the letter of credit is to ensure that landscaping is completed in the event that the <br />Developer defaults on this Agreement. The surety shall be valid for two full years from <br />the date of installation. <br />8. If noise from Building 9 exceeds MPCA noise regulations for residential areas at the <br />property line, the applicant shall reduce noise levels in order to be in compliance with <br />MPCA regulations. If the City receives complaints regarding noise levels, the applicant <br />shall be responsible for providing decibel measurements from the property line and <br />reducing noise levels to be in compliance with MPCA regulations. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Thompson opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth questioned if the site would be adequately parked after the site was <br />expanded. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the number of parking stalls on the site, along with the current <br />number of employees and reported the site would be adequately parked. He stated the site had no <br />overflow parking issues at this time. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson opened the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment Chair Thompson closed the public hearing at 6:47 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones asked if the expansion was for additional sterilization space. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.