07-10-17-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JUNE 19, 2017 2 JR Hospitality Principal Jay Bhakta noted that they have been looking for a site in the area for quite a while. Hampton Inn is part of the Hilton Hotel chain and is considered a top select service hotel. They are hoping for input from the Council before they move forward in the application process. Mayor David Grant began a discussion about building materials and mentioned that Hampton Inns have a signature look which may not line up with the City building materials requirements. Mr. Bhakta noted that it is extremely rare for Hampton Inns to meet the City’s requirement of 75 percent brick and stone. An elevated level of exterior finish for them would typically be 45 percent of these materials. They want to be sure to keep the look and feel of the brand, but comply as much as possible with the City. Councilmember Steve Scott asked how the Hampton Inn is positioned within the Hilton brand. Mr. Bhakta explained that the Hampton Inns were originally introduced as a mid-scale brand but over the years has become an upper mid-scale brand. Councilmember Dave McClung asked about the entry/exit on the northeast corner of the property going to the landlocked 1143 Red Fox Road property behind the existing hotel. Mr. Bhakta stated the intention was future entry to the property if a complimentary business is constructed there. Mayor Grant asked for an explanation of the number of parking stalls requested. Mr. Bhakta responded that brand standard is 1:1, one stall for each guest room. Most housekeeping staff arrive around 9 am and most guests are no longer in the hotel by that time. During peak hours in the morning employees there would be front desk, general manager, maintenance, and 7-8 housekeeping staff. During evenings there are typically only 2 staff members in the building. A lot of guests are also using Uber or Lyft to get to the hotels so less parking is needed. Councilmember Fran Holmes wondered if more explanation could be given about the parking setbacks and the drive lane width. Senior Planner Bachler explained there is a parking side yard setback requirement of 5 feet from the property line. Originally the drive lanes were shown as 24 feet wide, but the Lake Johanna Fire Department requires the lanes to be 26 feet wide to bring in large equipment. When a more detailed site plan is done, there may be some parking stalls encroaching into the 5 foot setback to accommodate the wider drive lane. Councilmember Brenda Holden expressed her concern that the building will be too large for the property. Councilmember Holmes felt that a traffic study may not be necessary.