My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-17-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
09-25-17-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2017 11:54:32 AM
Creation date
9/22/2017 11:32:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
417
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Geotechnical Report <br />2018 PMP Streets <br />Arden Hills, Minnesota <br />WSB Project No. 010111-000 Page 2 <br />2. PROCEDURES <br /> <br />2.1 Boring Layout and Soil Sampling Procedures <br />The City requested we complete eighteen (18) soil borings along the roadways to be reconstructed. <br />WSB recommended the boring depths and selected the desired locations. The borings were staked by <br />our surveyors. The approximate boring locations are shown on the Soil Boring Exhibit in Appendix A <br />which is an aerial photo. <br /> <br />We drilled the borings from July 27 to 28, 2017 with a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig operated by a two- <br />person crew. The drill crew advanced the borings using continuous hollow stem augers. Drilling <br />methods, crew chief, depths, sampling interval, casing usage, groundwater observat ions, test data, and <br />other drilling information are indicated on the boring logs. <br /> <br />Generally, the drill crew sampled the soil in advance of the auger tip at two and one-half foot (2½’) <br />intervals of a depth to fifteen feet (15’) and then at five foot (5’) intervals thereafter. The soil samples <br />were obtained using a split-barrel sampler which was driven into the ground during standard penetration <br />tests in accordance with ASTM D 1586, Standard Method of Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling <br />of Soils. <br /> <br />The materials encountered were described on field logs and representative samples were containerized, <br />and transported to our laboratory for further examination and testing. <br /> <br />The samples were visually examined to estimate the distribution of grain sizes, plasticity, consistency, <br />moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin. We classified the <br />soils according to type using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A chart describing the <br />Unified Soil Classification System is included in Appendix A. <br /> <br />2.2 Groundwater Measurements and Borehole Abandonment <br />The drill crew observed the borings for free groundwater while drilling and after completion. These <br />observations and measurements are noted on the boring logs. The crew then backfilled the borings with <br />soil cuttings to comply with Minnesota Department of Health regulations. <br /> <br />2.3 Boring Log Procedures and Qualifications <br />The subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings are illustrated on the Logs of Test Borings in <br />Appendix A. Similar soils were grouped into the strata shown on the boring logs, and the appropriate <br />estimated USCS classification symbols were also added. The depths and thickness of the subsurface <br />strata indicated on the boring logs were estimated from the drill ing results. <br /> <br />The transition between materials (horizontal and vertical) is approximate and is usually far more gradual <br />than shown. Information on actual subsurface conditions exists only at the specific locations indicated <br />and is relevant only to the time exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions and groundwater <br />levels at other locations may differ from conditions found at the indicated locations. The nature and <br />extent of these conditions would not become evident until exposed by construction excavation. These <br />stratification lines were used for our analytical purposes and, due to the aforementioned limitations, <br />should not be used as a basis of design or construction cost estimates.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.