07-05-2017 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for July 5, 2017 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-006 - Higher Education Study\Memos_Reports_17-006\PC Memo (07-05- 17)_17-006 Final.docx Page 2 of 6 some potential outcomes are described in executive summary of the study. Formal recommendations are not included in the report at this time. These potential outcomes are in two separate topics: the regulation of higher education uses and the land use and economic development issues to be considered for inclusion in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Any amendments to the regulation of higher education uses will need to be ultimately approved by the City Council by October 9, 2017 before the moratorium expires. The land use and economic development issues will continue to be discussed as the City develops the Comprehensive Plan update, which is expected to be approved in the first quarter of 2018. Staff would request that the Planning Commission review the summary of City Council discussion from their June 26 Work Session, provide suggestions on how to address the regulation of higher education uses within Arden Hills and provide feedback on which land use and economic development topics from this study should be included in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. June 26 City Council Work Session On June 26, Planning Commission Chair Roberta Thompson presented the findings of the draft Higher Education Study dated June 21, 2017. The presentation included a potential outcome to replace the current “Schools, Higher Education” definition with a “College, Campus” and “College, Office” definition. The “College, Campus” use was proposed to be allowed as a conditional use in the R-1 and B-1 districts and the “College, Office” use was proposed to be a conditional use in the B-2, B-4, and CC districts. The City Council discussed this potential outcome and recommended some revisions. The City Council liked the idea of two separate definitions, but had some questions about the types of educational uses that would be considered a “College” and what a definition of “College, Office” would include. Based on that feedback, staff is proposing to change the titles of the two uses to: “Higher education, campus” and “Higher education, classroom/office”. The City Council had greater concern with the zoning districts that the higher education uses would be allowed. The City Council recommended that the “Higher education, campus” use should have its own, separate, stand-alone zoning district. Staff suggested the creation of an “INST – Institutional” zoning district. The City Council recommended that the “Higher education, classroom/office” use be limited to less than the B-2, B-4, and CC zoning districts, but did not recommend any zoning district to remove that use from. The City Council did recommend that the “Higher education, classroom/office” use have a limitation on how much of a zoning district it can occupy. Based on the discussions and recommendations from the June 26 City Council Work Session, staff has prepared the following possible text amendments for the Planning Commission to review and discuss.