03-12-18-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Previous attempts to split lots in this area have resulted in comments about density[2][7] as well as being less willing to split "when there is currently reasonable use of the property."... which there certainly is. In 2006 [7] a development with 3695 and 3685 New Brighton Roadwas proposed with less density (it included the same total number of houses, but included 3695 New Brighton Road as well) and there were significant concerns about it - many are the same now, but worse. The future use plan labels this area "low density residential". As platted with drainage, easements, and wetland, it will/could be 3 houses, all 15 feet from each other. That's not low density and certainly doesn't fit with the neighborhood - where, during summer, people can barely see neighboring homes from their back yards. These lots are extremely skinny - lot 2 is functionally 66 feet wide. It flares at the road by way of including the easement to meet the minimum road width rules. It's only actually 31 feet wide at the road if you remove the lift station easement. Lot 2 isn't much wider in the back and has even less functional road frontage if you take out the wetland (with only a couple feet of unencumbered land abutting the road isn't easement of some sort - lot 2's driveway runs right through the city lift station easement). The fact the original property is being squeezed so much that they have to 1) move their driveway, 2) change the orientation of their home so it fronts Thom drive, and 3) still rip off a deck to meet minimum side setbacks[1] speaks to this overdevelopment. These three properties will average .6 acres - with the smallest two are under half an acre and the biggest being largely made up of wetland and need-to-be-constructed retaining ponds. [3] The smallest lot includes the proposed, smaller, lift station easement and is still 45% easement by land area (leaving less-than-R2-lot-size-minimum about 10.5k sqft buildable land, in two sections) and lot 1 is being 74% easement or wetland (or 11.3k sqft of buildable land, split into 3 sections). This is compared to the average property size on New Brighton Road from near the corner of E2 ot the train tracks is 1.32 acres.. all but 3 larger than .9 acres (and those are .62,.69 and .81 acres). If you include adjacent properties on Thom adjacent to property the average is 1.25 acres. Lot 2 and 3 would set the new standard for smallest properties on NBR by a large margin and be less than 1/3 the size of the average property. While they fit the R-2 minimums, they are too cramped for the area, don't fit in at all, and the myriad of issues uncovered in this email are directly due to the overdevelopment of this parcel. The planning commission has historically cared about keeping lots similar in size and has felt that cramming houses in is not in the best interests for the city. Denied case PC 07 005, also involving Richard Kotoski, involved creating lots roughly the size we are talking about by splitting 2015 Thom Dr.... which has adjacent properties much smaller than 3685 does. With the denial of that case, specifically, the commission stated that "Density was not the objective [of the city]" and that "reasonable use exists in its' current state" Further, the current planning commission has said "Given the wetland and protected drainage areas, a significant area of Lots 1 and 2 could not be built on." [1] and Tim, himself, said in a previous application for development that much of the lot [3685] was lift station or wetlands and "to look at the entire square footage was misrepresenting the fact that there was space to build on and[or] there was room to encroach into his back area" [7] He is right -- even though the raw sqft exists, this is not a property that should have 3 homes on it. Easement: The lift station has been around long before the current owner owned the property. The easement and lift station have been there well before Tim bought his property. The 2007 attempt to place one additional house on 3685 New Brighton road resulted in