Laserfiche WebLink
specifically point out: <br />The area needed for the 2012 construction extends significantly beyond the boundaries <br />of the proposed easement. <br />The city sewer going under the private driveway - this isn't the private sewer connection <br />but is, instead, the actual city sewer going into the lift station. Who is going to pay for <br />that driveway when repairs are needed? The city sewer also goes under the catch basin <br />and storm-water management items as well - further complicating and increasing the <br />costs of any future work here. <br />The myriad utilities (nat gas wasn't noted on plans but would likely go through here as <br />well) running through this area will clearly make the next rebuild more complex and <br />expensive -- exactly the reason the easement was made this large in the first place and <br />exactly what the 2012 rebuild shows was needed. <br />In the below image, I wanted to highlight how close the proposed 40' retaining wall is to the actual <br />lift station (not just the easement... but the lift station itself). The 40' long retaining wall is only a <br />couple of feet from the lift station. Any work on the list station would surely be made more difficult <br />and/or costly due to this wall. <br />Who pays when it's damaged by lift station rebuilds and maintenance work? Who pays when it <br />fails and the lift station is damaged / compromised? <br /> A catch basin would be at the base of this wall with a pipe that runs to the filtration basin. The full <br />impact might not be had from this angle but the adjacency should come through.