My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-18-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
03-12-18-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2018 9:41:39 AM
Creation date
3/13/2018 9:31:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A landscape architect indicates a different grading plan, designed with a better balance of protection and preservation vs purely for profit and ease, would be <br />able to save many more trees (as well as potentially fix some of the easement issues). I've highlighted the trees below that are not located on a building site <br />and are being killed simply due to grading and it being 'easier/cheaper to kill them than work around them' motives (directly killed in yellow, being kept but <br />will likely die in red... including some on my property). Many (most?) of those trees, some over a hundred years old, are being taken out out of <br />convenience... not necessity. A new grading plan that emphasized saving more mature, healthy, trees rather than clear cutting (as required by city code) <br />would serve to avoid "clear cutting" as well as help with the tree removal mitigation deficiency. <br />Page 7 of 12Reasons to Deny 3685 New Brighton Road Subdivision <br />3/9/2018http://joefederer.com/subdivision/Reasons.html
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.