My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-18-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
03-12-18-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 6:59:51 AM
Creation date
4/10/2018 2:41:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MARCH 12, 2018 15 <br /> Mayor Grant indicated he has searched for reasons to deny the request as well. He commented <br /> there were no reasons. He explained he did not like the proposed development. He stated he was <br /> hopeful the fear of what may occur was less than what would actually occur. He explained if the <br /> Council were to deny the Planning Case very specific reasons would have to be cited. <br /> Councilmember Scott read a portion of City Ordinance Section 1150-04 regarding Division or <br /> Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record from Subdivision 3 — Public Welfare. He reported this <br /> portion of Ordinance reads: it shall be determined the proposed subdivision shall not be <br /> detrimental or injurious to neighboring properties in which the subdivision is located. He <br /> believed that based on the testimony provided by the neighbors the proposed subdivision would <br /> be injurious to the neighbors. For this reason, he would be siding with Councilmember McClung <br /> and would not be offering his support to the proposed plat. <br /> Councilmember Holden requested comment from the City Attorney regarding this portion of <br /> City Code. <br /> City Attorney Jamnik stated this was a valid concern or standard. He noted courts do require the <br /> City to identify external impacts that may be detrimental to try and mitigate those potentially <br /> detrimental impacts. He explained the City was allowed to attach conditions to the requested plat <br /> and was part of the review process. He advised the conditions for approval were incorporated in <br /> the report. He indicated if the Council were to deny based on this portion of City Code, the <br /> Council would have to enunciate what the impacts were, how they were injurious, and how this <br /> development was unique or different when compared to other developments in the City. <br /> The motion carried 3-2 (McClung and Scott opposed). <br /> Mayor Grant asked if the Council had any further questions of staff regarding the vacation of the <br /> sewer easement. The Council had no further questions. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a <br /> motion to approve Resolution 2018-019 for the Vacation of a Sewer Easement <br /> for Arden Hills Lift Station #12 at 3685 New Brighton Road based on the <br /> findings of fact and submitted plans in the March 12, 2018 Report to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated he would not be offering his support to this motion based on <br /> Minnesota State Statute 412.851. He commented it did not appear to be in the City's best interest <br /> to vacate this easement as the City's long-term costs would be increased in order to maintain the <br /> Lift Station. <br /> Mayor Grant asked if the applicant could still proceed with the lot split even if the vacation of <br /> the easement were denied. <br /> City Planner Bachler reported this was correct. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated it was not in the public's best interest to vacate this easement <br /> and therefore, he would not be supporting the request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.