Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – April 4, 2018 4 <br /> <br />resulted in the property having a depth and area significantly greater than the minimum <br />requirement for the R-2 District. This, along with the topography and previous use of the <br />property as a fire station are unique circumstances that require the creation of lots that far <br />exceed the minimum lot area and depth requirement for the R-2 District, but require a <br />minor variance for each lot from the minimum lot width requirement. <br />23. Approximately one-third of the properties within this block that have lot widths less than <br />the required 85 feet for the R-2 District. While, the majority of the lots on this block are <br />85 feet wide or greater, few have the depth or area of the four lots proposed in the <br />redevelopment. <br />24. There is an economic consideration in this case because the applicant is seeking to keep <br />the homes at a more affordable price. This economic consideration on its own does not <br />constitute a practical difficulty, but may be considered as a factor. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated staff is supportive of the proposed Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment in this case. The proposed designation of the property as Very Low Density <br />Residential is consistent with the existing residential uses and densities in the surrounding area. <br />The change in use of the property from public and institutional to residential would not have a <br />significant impact in terms of traffic or demand on the City’s infrastructure. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler reported the findings of fact support a recommendation for approval of <br />the variance request. The Planning Commission should evaluate whether the proposed variance <br />meets the City requirements included in Section 1355.04, Subd. 4 as outlined above. If the <br />Planning Commission votes to deny the variance request, the findings of fact would need to be <br />amended to support the denial. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler explained staff recommends approval of Planning Case 18-001 for a <br />Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Variance at 3246 New <br />Brighton Road, based on the submitted plans and the finds of fact in the April 4, 2018 Report to <br />the Planning Commission, as amended by the following nineteen (19) conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. The execution of the Final Plat shall be contingent upon the Metropolitan Council’s <br />approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br />3. A Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City <br />Council approval. The Development Agreement shall be executed prior to the execution <br />of the Final Plat. <br />4. The applicant shall submit a park dedication fee in the amount of $26,000, subject to the <br />approval of the City Council. The park dedication fee shall be submitted prior to the <br />execution of the Final Plat. <br />5. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with the Ramsey County Recorder and provide the <br />City with a recorded copy within sixty (60) days of approval. <br />6. The applicant shall address all comments included in the memo provided by the Public <br />Works Director/City Engineer dated March 7, 2018 prior to the issuance of any <br />development permits.