My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-14-18-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
05-14-18-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 4:59:07 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 4:56:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – APRIL 9, 2018 5 <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka reported the low bid of $2,491,595.86 received <br />from Northwest Asphalt, Inc. compares favorably with the construction engineer’s estimate <br />which is $2,686,970.00. Further analysis of the low bid; adding overhead and dividing it into the <br />cost for the reconstruction and reclamation neighborhoods results in the following total project <br />costs: <br /> <br />• $3,103,300.00 Total Project Cost for the Reconstruction Neighborhood <br />• $237,100.00 Total Project Cost for the Reclamation Neighborhood <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka commented each of these total project costs were <br />then analyzed for the assessable cost which as described in the City’s Assessment Policy is half <br />of the street project cost. The results of this analysis are as follows: <br /> <br />• Reconstruction Assessment Rate of $10,219.52 per unit as compared to the Feasibility <br />Report estimate of $10,300. <br />• Reclamation Assessment Rate of $1,816.52 per unit as compared to the Feasibility Report <br />estimate of $2,000. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka stated in the past, the City Council has set the <br />interest rate for unpaid assessments with the resolution declaring costs to be assessed. The <br />current assessment policy states: <br /> <br />“H. Interest Rate on Unpaid Balance <br />The interest rate used for the assessment shall be designated at the prime rate plus two (2) <br />percentage points, fixed for the duration of the outstanding balance. The effective date of <br />the interest shall be the date the Council approval of the assessment role.” <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka reported two items have been identified upon <br />review of the City’s 2004 Assessment Policy and past practice: <br /> <br />1. The proposed resolution reflects the current assessment policy language. Staff would <br />recommend setting the interest rate at 2% over the City’s bond interest rate which is <br />approximately 3%, resulting in an assessment interest rate of 5%. <br />2. The City’s current assessment policy allows for property owners to pay the entire <br />assessment in full within thirty days without an interest charge. In addition, the <br />assessment policy states that “a property owner may pay the total assessment against their <br />property with accrued interest at any time during the life of the project assessment <br />period”. In 2015, property owners were allowed to make partial payments. It is staff’s <br />recommendation that the policy language regarding payment of the total assessment <br />amount be followed and that partial payments would not be allowed. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Polka commented in order to move both of these <br />projects forward, it would be appropriate for the Council to consider adopting a resolution with a <br />potential amendment to the interest rate language. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.