My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-18-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
05-21-18-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2018 4:23:39 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 4:22:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />May 22, 2017 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Table A-1 - Level of Service vs. Control Delay - Signalized and Unsignalized <br />Intersections (TWSC, AWSC & Roundabouts) <br />TWSC, AWSC & Roundabouts <br /> <br />Signalized Intersections <br />LOS by Volume to <br />Capacity Ratio (≤ 1)* <br />Control Delay per <br />Vehicle <br />(Seconds) <br /> LOS by Volume to <br />Capacity Ratio (≤ 1)* <br />Control Delay per <br />Vehicle <br />(Seconds) <br />A ≤10 A ≤10 <br />B >10 and ≤15 B >10 and ≤20 <br />C >15 and ≤25 C >20 and ≤35 <br />D >25 and ≤35 D >35 and ≤55 <br />E >35 and ≤50 E >55 and ≤80 <br />F >50 F >80 <br />Per the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. <br />* NOTE: When LOS by Volume to Capacity Ratio >1.00, LOS is F. <br /> <br /> <br />The acceptable Level of Service threshold for a particular movement at an intersection <br />depends on both the priority assigned to that movement and its traffic volume. In <br />general, the higher the priority and the higher the traffic volume, the more stringent the <br />acceptable threshold will be. For example, the acceptable threshold for a high- <br />priority/high-volume rural movement might be C, while LOS F on a low-priority/low- <br />volume urban movement might be appropriate. <br /> <br />For two-way stop-controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness <br />is the side street LOS. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay <br />is attributed to the side-street/minor approaches. Long delays and poor LOS can <br />sometimes result on the side street, even if the overall intersection is functioning well, <br />making it a valuable design criterion. As the side-street/minor approach delay <br />approaches and exceeds 60 seconds per vehicle, drivers may divert to another route or <br />become impatient and accept gaps in the mainline traffic that are less than <br />acceptable/safe gaps resulting in the potential for traffic safety concerns. Therefore, <br />depending on priority and traffic volume, acceptable side-street LOS can range from D <br />to F. Side streets can operate at LOS F without the intersection warranting a change in <br />traffic control. <br /> <br />A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular <br />queuing, as defined the line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An <br />intersection can operate with an acceptable Level of Service, but if queues from the <br />intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land <br />uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.