My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-18-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
06-11-18-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2018 8:23:39 AM
Creation date
6/7/2018 4:08:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 9, 2018 4 <br /> <br />[Type text] <br /> <br />Chair Thompson commented the new conditions would state the property owner will work with <br />the City to utilize the existing sign while continuing to meet City sign requirements. She stated <br />her goal would be to make the sign more attractive. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler indicated staff’s preference would be to have a monument sign installed <br />versus reconditioning the existing sign. He suggested the condition state the applicant will work <br />with staff on any plans to modify the existing pole sign so that all plans are in conformance with <br />the sign code. He noted a sign permit application would have to be submitted to City staff. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson recommended Condition 5 remain be amended to remove the words free- <br />standing monument sign that Condition 6 also be amended per staff direction. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler supported this recommendation and suggested Condition 6 read: A sign <br />permit shall be required for renovation of the existing free-standing sign and for any wall <br />signage. The existing pylon sign will remain in place so long as any modifications are in <br />conformance with the City’s sign code requirements. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson commented a sign permit would still be required for all other signage on the <br />property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth stated he would like the Commission to consider minimizing the <br />requirements and conditions for this request. He noted the existing sign was already in place, it <br />was too high and was non-conforming. He encouraged the Commission to restrain piling on <br />additional conditions that were not necessary for this case. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson recommended the applicant have sign renderings available prior to this item <br />being reviewed by the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones stated he would rather leave the pylon sign in place versus having a <br />monument sign. He feared that the monument sign would block sight lines for those traveling on <br />Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson moved and Commissioner Zimmerman seconded a motion to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case 18-010 for a Site Plan Review at 4061 Lexington Avenue based <br />on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the ten (10) revised <br />conditions in the May 9, 2018, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried <br />unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.