My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-18-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
06-11-18-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:15:54 AM
Creation date
7/17/2018 10:08:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 11, 2018 9 <br /> Councilmember Holden recommended that no trees be required at this gateway sign and that <br /> only low shrubs be used if plantings were required. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if a retaining wall would be required. <br /> City Planner Bachler stated a retaining wall would likely be needed because the land had a slope <br /> to it. He reported staff was uncertain as to how much the retaining wall would cost. <br /> Eric Vogel, Sambatek, expressed concern with how the proposed gateway sign would impact <br /> visibility of the site. He noted the applicant has attempted to abide by the Council's <br /> recommendation with the signage and respectfully asked the gateway sign not be required. <br /> Councilmember Holden commented the gateway sign would only be five feet in height and <br /> asked how this would impact visibility of the proposed business. <br /> Mr. Vogel stated he feared the gateway sign could create confusion. He understood the pylon <br /> sign would be taller than the gateway sign, but it was his fear the gateway sign would detract from <br /> the pylon sign. <br /> Councilmember McClung discussed how the proposed gateway sign could increase visibility for <br /> the property by attracting the eye of passersby. <br /> Mayor Grant stated his interest was to have an adequate amount of easement to install a gateway <br /> sign that was similar to the one found on the triangle parcel. <br /> Councilmember Scott asked if the applicant would be placing signage on the building. <br /> City Planner Bachler stated the City has not received a request from the applicant for building <br /> signage but anticipated a request would be forthcoming. <br /> Mayor Grant noted the pylon sign was non-conforming but preexisting and would be <br /> grandfathered in. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember McClunz moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br /> motion to approve Planning Case 18-010 for a Site Plan Review at 4061 <br /> Lexington Avenue North, based on the findings of fact and the submitted <br /> plans, as amended by the ten (10) conditions in the June 11, 2018 Report to <br /> the City Council. <br /> AMENDMENT: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion <br /> to add Condition 11 to read: The Planning Case is dependent upon <br /> negotiating a 27' x 27' easement in the corner prior to the City issuing <br /> a Certificate of Occupancy. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if this Condition would address the easement needed from Xcel <br /> Energy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.