Laserfiche WebLink
Clinical AND Health Affairs <br />36 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 <br />in other places. For example, in New York <br />City, compliance has fallen over time after <br />Tobacco 21 policy was implemented.10 <br />Calculation: In this analysis, we began <br />with a cohort of Minnesota 15-year-olds <br />in 2015–approximately 72,000. We esti- <br />mated the smoking initiation rate in two <br />periods: during high school (ages 15 to 17 <br />years) and after high school (ages 18 to <br />20 years). Next, the reduction in smoking <br />was calculated for each period if the sale <br />age for tobacco were raised to 21 in 2015. <br />We assumed that the smoking uptake in <br />high school and after high school would <br />not change in future years. The difference <br />is reported as the number of young people <br />15 to 20 years of age who would not have <br />started smoking. <br />Results <br />In 2015, the Minnesota population of <br />those 15-year-olds was approximately <br />72,000. Of these, an estimated 7,200 will <br />start smoking during their high school <br />years. If the minimum legal sale age in <br />2015 were 21, an estimated 1,800 would <br />not start smoking in high school. <br />tion, the expected reduction in smoking <br />initiation is thought to vary by age. The ef- <br />fect is expected to be larger among youth <br />15 to 17 years of age, with an expected re- <br />duction in the uptake of smoking of 25%. <br />Among those 18 to 20 years of age, the <br />expected reduction is 15%.4 <br />Variation by demographic variables: <br />Smoking rates vary substantially by popu- <br />lation groups in Minnesota. For example, <br />in 2014 the overall adult smoking rate was <br />about 14%,1 but within the urban Ameri- <br />can Indian population the smoking rate <br />was 59%.8 There is a lack of literature on <br />how smoking initiation would be affected <br />in population groups with higher smoking <br />rates if the sale age were increased. Thus, <br />the estimate here is not adjusted by gender <br />or other demographic variables (eg, race/ <br />ethnicity, income). <br />Enforcement: States are required to <br />enact and enforce laws prohibiting the sale <br />or distribution of tobacco products to in- <br />dividuals younger than 18 years of age. A <br />major assumption of Tobacco 21 policy is <br />that the same level of current enforcement <br />and retailer compliance would remain in <br />effect. Although Minnesota has a high <br />rate of retailer compliance with current <br />law,9 retailer cooperation has been lower <br />information about the expected effects at <br />a state level. <br />The purpose of this study was to con- <br />sider the effects on smoking initiation in <br />Minnesota if the legal minimum sale age <br />for tobacco products were 21. The specific <br />goal was to calculate how many young <br />people ages 15 to 20 years would not start <br />smoking if the assumptions from the IOM <br />report were applied to Minnesota. <br />Methods and Assumptions <br />Age groups: The 2015 IOM report exam- <br />ined effects among specific age groups: <br />under 15 years, 15- to 17-year-olds and <br />18- to 20-year-olds. In this analysis, we <br />limited the consideration to ages 15 and <br />older. <br />Initiation rate: Cohort studies that fol- <br />low participants over time provide the best <br />estimates of smoking initiation. The Min- <br />nesota Adolescent Community Cohort <br />(MACC) study was a population-based <br />study of Minnesota youth ages 12 to 16 <br />in 2000 who were followed until 2008. In <br />2003, approximately 19% of the cohort <br />reported smoking in the previous month.6 <br />Smoking among Minnesota high school <br />students has fallen to about 10% since <br />2003. Therefore, in this analysis we used <br />10% as the estimate of smoking initiation <br />among youth 15 to 17 years of age. <br />In a later analysis of the MACC data, <br />16% of the cohort who did not start <br />smoking in high school took up smoking <br />(smoked in the past month) between the <br />ages of 18 and 21.7 This estimate of smok- <br />ing uptake is consistent with the preva- <br />lence of smoking among young adults in <br />the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey. For <br />this analysis we used 16% as the estimate <br />of 18- to 20-year-olds who would initiate <br />smoking. <br />Estimated effects of Tobacco 21 policy: <br />An increase in the minimum sale age is <br />expected to apply to all commercial to- <br />bacco products; however, for the purpose <br />of estimating effects similar to those in the <br />IOM report, the scope of this study was <br />restricted to cigarette smoking. In addi- <br />COHORT AGE <br />(YEARS) <br />NUMBER WHO <br />HAVE NOT <br />SMOKED <br />PROPORTION <br />WHO START <br />SMOKING <br />NUMBER <br />SMOKING <br />NUMBER NOT <br />SMOKING IF <br />POLICY WERE <br />IN EFFECT <br />15 72,000 <br />16 to 17 64,800 10% 7,200 1,800 <br />18 to 20 54,432 16% 10,368 1,555 <br />FIGURE <br />Estimated Reduction in Youth Smokers with Implementation <br />of Tobacco 21 Policy <br />NUMBER OF YOUTHAges 15 to 17 years <br />WITHOUT TOBACCO 21 POLICY <br />WITH TOBACCO 21 POLICY <br />Ages 18 to 20 years <br />7,200 <br />17,568 <br />5,400 <br />8,813 <br />14,213 <br />Combined Total <br />AGE GROUPS AFFECTED BY TOBACCO 21 POLICY <br />TOTAL: 3,355Note: The cohort size is 1/5 of the census estimate of <br />Minnesota 15- to 19-year-olds in 2015. <br />10,368