My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-18-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
08-27-18-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2018 4:37:13 PM
Creation date
8/23/2018 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 16, 2018 2 <br />includes additional restrictions on tree and vegetation removal within the Shore Impact Zone and <br />on steep slopes in the Shoreland Management District. <br />City Planner Bachler explained to mitigate the impacts of the removal of significant trees, the <br />City has adopted a Tree Preservation Ordinance (Section 1325.055). A Tree Preservation Plan is <br />required as part of an application for new building construction, expansion of an existing building <br />or hard surface by 10 percent or more, projects that requires a Grading and Erosion Control <br />Permit, and for a plat or minor subdivision. The Tree Preservation Ordinance does not prohibit the <br />removal of significant trees, but it does give the City authority to work with a property owner to <br />designate certain trees for preservation and to require replacement tree plantings. <br />City Attorney Joel Jamnik explained he had a difficult time finding an Ordinance that addressed <br />vegetation removal and clear cutting. He commented further on how these Ordinances handle <br />violations and discussed the proposed fines. He was of the opinion courts would not impose the <br />full $1,000 fine. He anticipated a $300-400 fine could be imposed on a first-time offense. He <br />reported staff could fashion language to address landscape enhancements and clear cutting that <br />would have to occur for this type of activity. <br />Councilmember Holden discussed the amount of time the City spends addressing homeowners <br />along Lake Johanna that have cleared large amounts of vegetation. <br />City Attorney Jamnik commented cleanup costs could be abated back to a homeowner, but <br />noted staff and attorneys’ fees would be difficult to recover. <br />City Planner Bachler stated one of the difficulties facing the City at this time was defining clear <br />cutting. <br />Councilmember Holden recommended information regarding clear cutting and vegetative <br />removal be included in the new resident packet, along with being posted on the City’s website. <br />She explained she was really concerned with the clear cutting that was occurring on Lake <br />Johanna. <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported it would be difficult to close the loopholes that are occurring now <br />without stricter enforcement on the City’s part. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the Thom Drive situation. <br />Councilmember Fran Holmes stated she did not believe the Thom Drive issue was a concern. <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern with how the Thom Drive property was clear cut <br />prior to seeking approval to the City for the subdivision. <br />City Attorney Jamnik commented if the City Council was interested, staff could continue to <br />work on this to address intensive vegetation removal, separate from a development or landscaping <br />activity. Secondarily, he would also address holding up building permits and certificates of <br />occupancy if a restoration order was necessary.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.