My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-07-18 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2018
>
02-07-18 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 3:52:59 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 3:50:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_________________________________________________________________________________________ <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for February 7, 2018 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-004 - Sign Code Amendment\Memos_Reports_17-004 <br /> <br />Page 1 of 8 <br /> <br />DATE: February 7, 2018 PC Agenda Item 4.A <br /> <br />TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners <br /> <br />FROM: Matthew Bachler, City Planner <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Planning Case #17-004: Sign Code Review <br /> <br /> <br />Requested Action <br /> <br />Review preliminary revisions to the Sign Code and provide comments and recommendations. <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />At the Planning Commission meeting on February 8, 2017, staff presented the following topics <br />regarding the City’s Sign Code: <br />• Review of planning cases from past 5 years that included a deviation from the Sign Code <br />• Comparison of the Arden Hills Sign Code with sign regulations adopted by cities in the <br />surrounding area in the following areas: wall signage, freestanding signage, dynamic <br />display signs, temporary signs, and projecting signs <br /> <br />A copy of the staff report from the meeting is included in Attachment A and the minutes from <br />the meeting are provided in Attachment B. Based on their discussion, the Planning Commission <br />recommended focusing on the following areas: <br />• Permit wall signage as a percentage of the building elevation area rather than a set square <br />foot amount <br />• Allow for greater flexibility in the use of dynamic display sign while ensuring quality of <br />signs and reducing distraction <br />• Allow for larger freestanding signs for properties with highway frontage <br />• Permit the use of projecting signs <br />• Evaluate temporary sign regulations, including how regulations address devices such as <br />inflatable mascots <br /> <br /> MEMORANDUM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.