My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-07-18 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2018
>
03-07-18 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 4:27:00 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 4:05:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 7, 2018 12 <br /> <br />Commissioner Dixon stated he would like to see a sign code ordinance in place that would <br />minimize the number of requests for sign code variances. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson agreed it was the City’s goal to amend the sign code in order to have less sign <br />variance requests. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated the Planning Commission could consider shifting the percentage <br />from somewhere between 5 and 10 percent of the building elevation area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones questioned how wall signage would be handled by the City when <br />businesses choose to co-locate, such as Cub Foods and TCF Bank or Target and CVS. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated in these cases the amount of wall signage permitted for the <br />elevation would need to be shared between the businesses. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth recommended the wall signage criteria have language that specifies <br />clarity and visibility requirements from the freeway or other major roadway for both visual and <br />safety purposes. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler reported the proposed changes should help address this, but that sign <br />standard adjustments may still be needed in certain cases. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson supported the City having more language in place to address dynamic display <br />signs. She liked the idea of having dimmers in place. She questioned how the City would <br />address dynamic display signs that were placed in windows inside an establishment. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated staff would have to investigate how to handle this further. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gehrig stated he supported dynamic display signs with the understanding it <br />would be difficult for the City to monitor the brightness and transition periods. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones stated his main concern with dynamic display signs was the duration or <br />transition period. He explained gas stations already have dynamic display signs and he did not <br />oppose these. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler recommended dynamic display signs only be allowed in commercial <br />zoning districts and not residential. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson did not believe projecting signs would be a good fit for Arden Hills except for <br />the Town Center within TCAAP. The Commission was in agreement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones asked if dynamic display should be considered for temporary trailer signs. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated currently the Sign Code prohibits portable signs. He noted <br />sandwich board signs were allowed. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson thanked staff for the detailed report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.