Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 7, 2018 8 <br /> <br />significantly damaged during construction, the City would require the trees to be replaced at a <br />ratio of two caliper inches for every one inch removed. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson reported the tree replacement and bond requirement was addressed in <br />Conditions 11 and 12. She stated she supported keeping the cottonwood trees as significant trees <br />within the calculations. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson thanked the neighbors for coming forward and voicing their concerns <br />regarding this development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gehrig moved and Commissioner Lambeth seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of 17-029 for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Vacation of <br />Easement at 3685 New Brighton Road, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, <br />as amended by the nineteen (19) conditions in the February 7, 2018 Report to the Planning <br />Commission. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Planning Case 18-001; Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Variance – 3246 New Brighton Road <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated this application was not complete in time to include on the <br />February 7, 2018 Planning Commission agenda. Staff requests that the Planning Commission <br />table Planning Case 18-001 until such time that a full review can be completed on the proposal. <br />A motion to table to a future meeting is necessary because this item had already been noticed as a <br />public hearing for this evening prior to it being pulled from the agenda. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones moved and Commissioner Lambeth seconded a motion to table action <br />on Planning Case 18-014 to the March 7, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. The motion <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Sign Code Update <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler reported at the Planning Commission meeting on February 8, 2017, staff <br />presented the following topics regarding the City’s Sign Code: <br /> <br />• Review of planning cases from past 5 years that included a deviation from the Sign Code <br />• Comparison of the Arden Hills Sign Code with sign regulations adopted by cities in the <br />surrounding area in the following areas: wall signage, freestanding signage, dynamic <br />display signs, temporary signs, and projecting signs <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated based on their discussion, the Planning Commission recommended <br />focusing on the following areas: <br /> <br />• Permit wall signage as a percentage of the building elevation area rather than a set square <br />foot amount <br />• Allow for greater flexibility in the use of dynamic display sign while ensuring quality of <br />signs and reducing distraction