My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-01-18 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
10-01-18 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2018 12:40:33 PM
Creation date
9/28/2018 12:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Wicklund read a summary on the invoices noting the City had incurred $312,000 in <br />administrative time and $827,000 in consultant time, for a total of $1.139 million. He read <br />language from the JPA and noted expenses could be reimbursed for things services other than <br />personnel and consultants. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Huffman stated this was a tension point between the City and the County. He <br />recommended the JDA acknowledge receipt of the invoices and not further discuss the matter <br />this evening, but rather through the tension point negotiations. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund agreed and thanked Commissioner Grant for bringing these invoices forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant discussed Section 2.3.2 and stated it was being misunderstood. He read <br />the language in full for the record and noted the approval of expenses rests with the JDA. He <br />questioned if the JDA was paying its bills. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund requested clarification from Director Olson on this matter. Director Olson <br />reported the County was the fiscal agent for the JDA and the County pays the bills for the JDA <br />attorney and financial advisor. He stated this process has been followed since 2012. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant stated the JDA was supposed to approve these expenses and the County <br />was not to be paying itself for these expenses. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund commented the County has been paying for JDA expenses incurred by the <br />County since 2012. He questioned when the City would be reimbursed for their expenses. <br />Director Olson stated this would occur once land sales began as this would create a financial <br />evolution for the JDA. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant understood that the County was acting as the fiscal agent for the JDA, <br />however he was concerned with the fact that the County was self-approving expenses without <br />coming before the JDA. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund recommended the processing and tracking of all JDA expenses come before the <br />group for clarification to ensure JPA requirements were being followed. He questioned how <br />the JDA wanted to proceed with this matter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Huffman stated this was a fair point and noted a procedure was agreed upon <br />that was not being followed. He did not believe there was any malicious intent on the County’s <br />behalf and recommended staff put forth a series of policies and procedures regarding financial <br />procedures. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant asked if the JDA had a reimbursement policy and if so, he requested a <br />copy of this document. Ms. Bolton commented she did not have the JDA organizational <br />documents with her and would have to report back to the JDA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.