My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-01-18 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
10-01-18 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2018 12:40:33 PM
Creation date
9/28/2018 12:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Lux stated the reason the MOU has not been delivered to the City was because his attorney <br />stated it was invalid due to the agreement between the developer and the County. He <br />explained the original thought was Alatus would take down all of the property at one time and <br />now the land would be taken down in increments over time. He commented this change made <br />the MOU invalid. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant stated on September 4th the JDA was informed the Civic Site would be part <br />of Phase I. He questioned what would stop the developer from executing the MOU if the Civic <br />Site was included in Phase I. <br /> <br />Mr. Lux explained Phase I includes three blocks in the down town area, but does not include the <br />Civic block. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund encouraged the City Council to meet with the developer in order to resolve this <br />issue. He anticipated a new MOU would have to be drafted to properly reflect the new terms <br />of the land sale. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant asked if the County had been made aware of the change. Mr. Lux <br />reported this was the case and stated he believed all three parties could come together in order <br />to reach a new MOU. He stated he could not take action on land that he does not yet own. <br /> <br />Commissioner Huffman reported the County has been negotiating in good faith. He stated the <br />Civic Site was not in the current phasing but stated he did not see any reason that the MOU <br />could be amended and resolved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant recommended there be some meetings between Alatus and the City of <br />Arden Hills. He questioned why the developer had not signed and submitted the document 18 <br />months ago, before the phasing was even addressed. Mr. Lux commented the issue of phasing <br />was being discussed quite early and for this reason the MOU was not executed. <br /> <br />Development Director’s Report <br /> <br />Director Perrault had nothing additional to report. <br /> <br />Administrative Director’s Report <br /> <br />Director Olson had nothing additional to report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Updates <br /> <br />Commissioner McClung apologized for being late to the meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.