My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-18-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
10-24-18-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2018 3:52:24 PM
Creation date
10/19/2018 3:52:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />Developer Proposal <br /> <br />Attached to this memo (see Attachment B) is a proposal by Alatus that outlines some of the <br />outstanding MDA issues and potential solutions to these issues. This proposal by the developer <br />represents one set of options, however, the developer is open to other ideas and/or changes to <br />their proposal. The developer’s proposals are: <br /> <br />• The City establish a TIF district to pay for the construction of a Community Center on the <br />site. The City would then not charge an amount equivalent to the Met Council SAC fee; <br />• The City charge a fee to recover its planning costs equal to the third party costs incurred <br />by the City; <br />• The County is requesting 161 additional units of Owner-Occupied homes to satisfy long- <br />term planning goals. <br /> <br />Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) <br /> <br />Due to the former ammunition plant, the City currently has approximately 4,600 SAC credits on <br />the site, and it is estimated the site will use approximately 2,400 SAC units at full buildout. This <br />means the City would not be required to remit any Met Council SAC fee to the Met Council, and <br />any associated fee, if charged, would be retained by the City as revenue for the City’s sewer fund <br />(estimated at $5.8 million). The developer has questioned the legal basis for the fee, and has <br />stated that this fee is too cumbersome on the development. To avoid any legal challenge, the <br />City could size the City’s SAC fee to an equivalent amount. <br /> <br />Larger issue: Does the City intend to charge this fee or can its goals be accomplished by utilizing <br />another financing mechanism? <br /> <br />Potential direction: <br /> <br />-The City Council could charge the whole fee; <br />-The City Council could charge a portion of the fee; <br />-The City Council could not charge the fee in favor of another financing mechanism to <br />accomplish City goals. <br /> <br />Civic Space on TCAAP <br /> <br />There is currently a 1.6 acre site on the TCAAP property that has been zoned for Civic Use, <br />which is defined as Civic and Community Use. The City and developer have long discussed the <br />potential for a community oriented building on that space, which has yet to be determined. <br />Currently, there is language in the draft MDA that would allow the City the right to purchase the <br />land for one dollar within two years of the MDA being signed, with the caveat that the City <br />would need to construct an approved facility on the site within a given timeframe. The City <br />would retain this right for up to seven years after the signing of the MDA, however, the cost to <br />purchase the land increases as the years progress. The Council could give direction to retain this <br />language in the MDA, alter the language, or remove the language all together. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.