My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-18-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
10-24-18-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2018 3:52:24 PM
Creation date
10/19/2018 3:52:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Friday, October 12, 2018 <br />2 of 3 <br /> <br />public-private partnership, the parties additional shared goals remain to maximize benefits to the area <br />and greater region through creation of jobs, housing, and sustainable development. <br />Through finalization of the Master Development Agreement (MDA) (and corresponding Cooperative <br />Agreement between the City and County), Master Developer will ultimately be responsible for executing <br />on the vision and to assist and inform the City and County and their consultants in the implementation <br />and delivery of this shared vision. <br /> <br />Current Status of MDA: <br />The parties together are working in good faith with the shared goals to accomplish the following; <br />1. Create an extraordinary one-of a kind landmark development <br />2. Create a project that is accretive to the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County and State of MN <br />3. Limit the potential exposure to existing residents of Arden Hills from the any financial burden <br />associated with this project and produce a financially “net neutral” deal for the City <br />4. Remain consistent with the vision of the Master Plan TRC <br /> <br />Open Issues List – to be Resolved to Finalize MDA: <br />Below are the primary outstanding issues that need to be resolved in order to finalize the MDA. The <br />following solutions proposed are one potential path to resolution and may not be the only solution: <br />1. The Project does not support the burden of a Met Council SAC equivalent fee, and the City desires to <br />see a civic/community center on the site. <br />a. Potential solution: in lieu of charging those fees, the Master Developer (or one of its <br />development partners) will build a civic/community center at no charge to the City as long as <br />the City creates a TIF district sized in the appropriate amount to reimburse the development <br />team for other TIF-eligible costs equivalent to the value of constructing a civic/community <br />center. (City and School District portion of Tax Increment) <br /> <br />2. The City has incurred and has budgeted planning area expenses in the amount of approximately <br />$1.1mm which includes both city staff labor and 3rd party expenses associated with the project. <br />a. Potential solution: a fee structure can be imposed on vertical developers as each parcel is <br />developed to reimburse the City for their 3rd party planning area costs in the amount of <br />approximately $800k in accordance with the JPA agreement. <br /> <br />3. County’s need for additional density on the site to satisfy their long-term planning goals. <br />a. Potential solution: City would grant Master Developer the potential for an additional 161 units <br />of Owner-Occupied homes to be distributed throughout the property as the development is <br />built over the next 15 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.