Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 5 <br />parks. As the Council gives direction, one driving tenet for staff will be to ensure the <br />development is paying for itself over the course of the project. <br /> <br />Larger issue: The City Council will want to ensure any increase in operating costs for TCAAP is <br />offset by additional tax revenue. <br /> <br />Infrastructure Costs <br /> <br />In the cooperative agreement, the City is responsible for cost of the water tower on TCAAP, the <br />trunk utilities that run along the spine road, a lift station and a booster station. The discussions <br />thus far have been that the water tower will be paid for via a special assessment and the trunk <br />utilities will be paid for by a City imposed Water Availability Charge (WAC) and Sewer <br />Availability Charge (SAC). For the special assessments, the land owner will be responsible for <br />paying the assessments, which helps reduce the risk to the City. The County has requested in the <br />initial Cooperative Agreement the City defer assessments until properties are sold to the <br />developer. City Staff would recommend Council not agree to this provision as it would put the <br />City financially at risk for the cost of the water tower if the development does not proceed. For <br />the City WAC and SAC fees, these would be collected by the City as the development <br />progresses and paid to the County (assuming the County provides the financing for the trunk <br />utilities). The County has requested that if the utilities are not repaid in full by 2037, the City <br />would owe the County the remaining balance of principal and interest. Staff would recommend <br />the Council not agree to this provision as it would put the City financially at risk if the <br />development does not proceed. In either case, the assessments and fees will be sized <br />appropriately to cover the costs related to the development and to ensure parties other than the <br />City are bearing the majority of the risk. <br /> <br />Larger issue: The Council wants to ensure the risk to the City is mitigated, and if the <br />development were to stall or not proceed the cost to the City minimized. <br /> <br />Associations for Services <br /> <br />The developer is currently working on a proposal to address basic and enhanced maintenance <br />services on TCAAP. <br /> <br />Fee Schedule <br /> <br />The current draft of the Cooperative Agreement notes that once the fee schedule is approved by <br />the Joint Development Authority (JDA) it may be increased by an inflationary amount each year, <br />but any other changes would need to be done by an amendment signed by both the City and <br />County. City Staff would recommend that the City not accept this provision, and that the fee <br />schedule imposed by the JDA be the same fee schedule that is updated and approved annually by <br />the City. <br /> <br />Larger issue: The Council wants to ensure fees charged by the development are sufficient to <br />cover anticipated costs. <br /> <br />