My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-17-18-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
12-17-18-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2019 8:35:20 AM
Creation date
1/16/2019 8:34:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — DECEMBER 17, 2018 5 <br />Councilmember Holmes said she doesn't have a problem with the land swap but wants to know <br />what Mr. Winiecki thinks. <br />Mayor Grant wondered what might happen if someone bought the Winiecki property years from <br />now and wanted to redevelop it. The design being proposed makes the property rectangular in <br />shape. <br />City Planner Mrosla stated that approximately 12 people were in attendance at the informal <br />neighborhood meeting held by Summit. Most of the comments were about the timing of the <br />project, screening of the parking lot and other parking questions, setbacks, density and traffic <br />access onto Old Highway 10. Most residents at the meeting were in general support of the plan. <br />Another neighborhood meeting with more information will be held at a later date. <br />Councilmember McClung noted that the land is oddly shaped, the swap would allow us to make <br />improvements to the city owned park land and gain the asset of a trail segment, so he thought the <br />Council would be setting a pretty high precedent that would have to be met by others that may <br />want to land swap. He is leaning toward supporting the swap but would love the building to be <br />closer to 100 units. And he wanted to be sure there would be enough landscape buffering. <br />Mr. Kohout said buffering is a concern for them as well and that some berming and tree plantings <br />will not be an issue. As a next step, they will figure out the unit combination so they can give a <br />firm response to parking needs. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if there was a category for the Comprehensive Plan that would <br />allow 22 units per acre without making it generally high density, and what would that <br />classification be? <br />City Planner Mrosla responded that the current land us is 12 units per acre, they are asking for <br />22.5 units per acre. Memory care units are often looked at as .5 units so that would give <br />flexibility to the number of units. <br />Councilmember Holden said she was also interested in making sure a sidewalk was put in from <br />Old Highway 10 to the cul-de-sac. <br />City Planner Mrosla stated as part of the application Staff was going to require some kind of <br />dedication or trail easement area so if the trail system ever gets built down Old Highway 10 that <br />property easement on Parkshore Drive would be available. <br />Councilmember Scott said that he doesn't feel as restrictive on the 120 units, but what sells this <br />for him is the underground parking concept, as that minimizes the footprint of asphalt. <br />Mr. Kohout gave an explanation of building heights and midpoint measurements. They are <br />planning to build the facility as low as possible on the lot. From I-694 it may look like a three <br />story structure with a half of a basement. He also explained what some of the interior features of <br />the facility may look like. <br />Mayor Grant said he was OK with the land swap and didn't feel the additional units would add <br />that much to traffic in the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.